单切口Needleless无针吊带与TOT治疗女性压力性尿失禁临床疗效的比较研究

傅琦博; 吕坚伟; 方伟林; 蒋晨; 顾寅珺; 冷静; 薛蔚

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2016.12.004

单切口Needleless无针吊带与TOT治疗女性压力性尿失禁临床疗效的比较研究

- 1 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院南院泌尿外科(上海, 201112);
- 2 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院泌尿外科
基金项目:
上海申康医院发展中心临床科技创新项目(编号SHDC12015911)

详细信息

通讯作者: 吕坚伟,E-mail:ljwass@126.com

中图分类号: R699.7;R694.54

收稿日期: 2016-10-08

Clinical efficacy of Needleless sling technique and TOT in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence:aproactive randomized controlled trial

- 1 Department of Urology, South Campus of Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201112, China;
- 2 Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

More Information

Corresponding author: LV Jianwei, E-mail: ljwass@126.com

Received Date: 08 October 2016

摘要

摘要: 目的:通过与经闭孔无张力尿道中段吊带术(TOT)的比较,评估单切口Needleless无针吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效和安全性。方法:将2014年9月~2015年9月期间收治的压力性尿失禁患者采用信封抽取方式随机分为Needleless组和TOT组,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、手术治愈率、手术并发症、术后疼痛等围手术期指标及随访后手术治愈率、压力性尿失禁评分、腹股沟/大腿内侧疼痛等指标。结果:共计164例患者入组本研究,Needleless组78例,TOT组86例,两组患者术前一般资料差异无统计学意义。围手术期比较,Needleless组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后24 h疼痛及住院时间方面均明显优于TOT组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。术后2周手术治愈率及围手术期并发症两组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),Needleless组在腹股沟/大腿内侧疼痛评分方面优于TOT组(P＜0.01);术后6、12个月手术治愈率、尿垫试验及ICIQ-SF评分两组差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05),腹股沟疼痛发生率Needleless组低于TOT组,但差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。两组患者术后生活质量评分较术前均有显著提高(P＜0.01),但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论:单切口Needleless无针吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁疗效与TOT手术相当,手术简便快捷,术中出血少,恢复快,可明显降低患者术后腹股沟区疼痛,缩短住院时间,是一种简便、安全、有效的微创吊带手术。
- Needleless /
- 单切口 /
- 压力性尿失禁 /
- 手术
Abstract: Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between Needleless sling technique and trans-obturator vaginal tape (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.Method: From Sep. 2014 to Sep. 2015, consecutive subjects were enrolled in the study which were randomized by envelope technique at the time of surgery to either TOT or Needleless anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, groin pain scores, operative complications, hospital stay and operation cure parameters were recorded for each patient. The follow-up visit included cure parameters, groin pain and incontinence questionnaire-short form (ICIQ-SF).Result: A total of 164 patients assessed for eligibility were randomized into Needleless groups (n=78) and TOT (n=86). There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, process, parity, pad test or preoperative quality of life assessment between the two comparative study groups. In the perioperative period, statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in operating time, blood loss, groin pain scores 24 h postoperatively and hospital stays (P＜0.01). Two weeks follow-up, a statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in groin pain scores, but there was no significant difference between Needleless technique and TOT groups in cure rates, pad test, complications or ICIQ-SF. After one year, there was no significant difference between Needleless technique and TOT groups in cure rates, pad test, groin pain or ICIQ-SF. Both groups registered a significant improvement in quality of life (P＜0.01).Conclusion: The single incision Needleless sling technique is a safe, effective treatment with less side effects and less complications.
- Needleless /
- single incision /
- stress urinary incontinence /
- surgery

HTML全文

参考文献(12)

[1]	Novara G,Artibani W,Barber M D,et al.Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on Colposuspensions,Pubovaginal Slings,and Midurethral Tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence[J].Eur Urol,2010,58(2):218-238.
[2]	Hazewinkel M H,Hinoul P,Roovers J.Persistent groin pain following a trans-obturator sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence:a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge[J].Int Urogynecol J,2009,20(3):363-365.
[3]	中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆底学组.女性压力性尿失禁诊断和治疗指南(试行)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2011,46(10):796-798.
[4]	Latthe P M,Foon R,Toozs-Hobsonp.Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence:a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications[J].BJOG,2007,114(5):522-531.
[5]	Delorme E.Transobturator urethral suspension:miniinvasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women[J].Prog Urol,2001,11(6):1306.
[6]	Laurikainen E H,Valpas A,Kiilholma P,et al.A prospective randomized trial comparing TVT and TVTO procedures for treatment of SUI:immediate outcome and complications[J].Int Urogynecol J,2006,17:S104-S105.
[7]	Krofta L,Feyereisl J,Otcenasek M,et al.TVT-S for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence:prospective trial,1-year follow-up[J].Int Urogynecol J,2010,21(7):779-785.
[8]	Hota L S,Hanaway K,Hacker M R,et al.TVT-Secur(Hammock)versus TVT-Obturator;a randomized trial of suburethral sling operative procedures[J].Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg,2012,18(1):41-45.
[9]	Hinoul P,Vervest H,den Boon J,et al.A randomized,controlled trial comparing an innovative single incision sling with an established transobturator sling to treat female stress urinary incontinence[J].J Urol,2011,185(4):1356-1362.
[10]	Cabrera J,Puyol M,Sousa A,et al.Minimum invasive surgical technique without needle(Contasure Needleless)for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence:A multicentric trial[J].Eur Urol Suppl,2008,7(3):147.
[11]	Martinez Franco E,Amat Tardiu L.Contasure-Needleless single incision sling compared with transobturator TVT-O for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence:long-term results[J].Int Urogynecol J,2015,26(2):213-218.
[12]	Karateke A,Cam C,Ince S B,et al.Effects of single vaginal incision technique on quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2011,18(5):634-639.