输尿管结石患者ESWL成功率与KUB中放射学参数之间关系及其预测因子的分析

刘宁宁; 高宏伟; 史启铎

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2016.12.016

输尿管结石患者ESWL成功率与KUB中放射学参数之间关系及其预测因子的分析

- 天津医科大学第二医院尿石症治疗中心(天津, 300211)

详细信息

通讯作者: 史启铎,E-mail:shiqiduo@126.com

中图分类号: R693.4

收稿日期: 2016-03-02

Analysis of the relationship between ESWL success rate and radiology parameters in KUB and predictors of ESWL success rate in patients with ureteral calculi

- Department of Urology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, China

More Information

Corresponding author: SHI Qiduo, E-mail: shiqiduo@126.com

Received Date: 02 March 2016

摘要

摘要: 目的:探讨X线平片(肾-输尿管-膀胱,KUB)中输尿管结石的影像学参数与体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)成功率之间的关系。方法:本研究包括446例有影像学证据的输尿管结石并经ESWL治疗患者。ESWL之前进行血常规及尿常规分析、X线平片(KUB)及非强化CT平扫检查(NCCT)。根据KUB中影像学参数将所有患者分成两组:低密度(LD)组(结石密度低于或等于第12 肋)和高密度(HD)组(结石密度高于第12肋)。ESWL后每周进行KUB检查对结石状态进行评估。ESWL后4周内结石消失被定义为治疗成功。对患者的临床资料、KUB及NCCT中结石参数、ESWL成功率进行比较,并分析ESWL成功率的预测因子。结果:LD组包括326例患者,HD组包括120例患者。结石的平均大小在LD组(7.33±1.25 mm)中显著低于HD组(9.75±2.84 mm)(P＜0.05)。EWSL成功率在LD组及HD组分别为81.6% 和59.2%(P＜0.05)。ESWL平均次数分别为LD组(1.7±1.3)次,HD组(2.4±1.4)次(P＜0.05)。应用多变量logistic回归分析显示,结石大小、绞痛发作开始到ESWL时间及KUB上结石密度是ESWL成功的单独预测指标。结论:以KUB中结石密度分组比较显示,两组在ESWL成功率中差异有统计学意义,且我们的数据指出较大的结石、发病距离ESWL时间较长及输尿管结石密度高于第12肋可能是ESWL失败的相关因素。本研究为以KUB作为临床手段预测ESWL成功率提供了证据,并在临床实践中对结石病预后评估与治疗方式选择有一定的指导意义。
- 输尿管结石 /
- 体外冲击波碎石 /
- 骨密度
Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship between the imaging parameters in X-ray plain film of KUB (kidney-ureter-bladder) and the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients with ureteral calculi.Method: This study included 446 patients with radiographic evidence of patients with ureteral calculi who were treated with ESWL. Before ESWL the data of routine blood and urine analysis, X-ray plain film of KUB and the CT scan (NCCT) were gathered. All of the patients were divided into two groups according to the imaging parameters in KUB, low density (LD) group (stone density less than or equal to 12th rib) and high density (HD) group (calculi density higher than the 12th rib). KUB was performed weekly after ESWL to evaluate calculi state. It was defined as a successful treatment if stone disappeared within four weeks after ESWL. The clinical data of patients, calculi parameters in KUB and in NCCT and the ESWL success rate were compared, and the predictors of success rate of ESWL were analyzed.Result: The LD group included 326 patients, while the HD group included 120 patients. The average size of stone in the group of LD was significantly lower than that in HD (7.33±1.25 mm vs. 9.75±2.84 mm, P＜0.05). EWSL success rate in LD and HD group were 81.6% and 59.2% respectively (P＜ 0.05). ESWL average frequency of LD group and the HD group were (1.7±1.3) times and (2.4±1.4) times respectively (P＜ 0.05). The multivariate logistic analysis showed that the stone size, colic attacks to ESWL time and density on KUB calculi were independent predictors of success in ESWL.Conclusion: Stone of density in the KUB grouping comparison shows that two groups have significant difference in the success rate of ESWL, and our data point out that the larger stones, long time to ESWL, skin to stone distance and ureteral calculi density are related factors of ESWL success rate. This study provides evidence to predict ESWL success rate with KUB, and has certain guiding significance to evaluate the prognosis of urinary calculi and the choice of treatment in clinical practice.
- ureteral stone /
- ESWL /
- bone density

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	Prstojevic J K,Junuzovic D,Hasanbegovic M,et,al.Characteristics of calculi in the urinary tract[J].Mater Sociomed,2014,26(5):297-302.
[2]	Stamatelou K K,Francis M E,Jones C A,et al.Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States:1976-1994[J].Kidney,2003,63(5):1817-1823.
[3]	Junuzovic D,Prstojevic J K,Hasanbegovic M.Evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL):efficasy in treatment of urinary system stones[J].Acta Inform Med,2014,22(5):309-314.
[4]	Kim Y J,Kim C H,Sung E J,et al.Association of nephrolithiasis with metabolic syndrome and its components[J].Metabolism,2013,62(6):808-813.
[5]	Tanaka M,Yokota E,Toyonaga Y,et al.Stone attenuation value and cross-sectional area on computed tomography predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy[J].Korean J Urol,2013,54(7):454-459.
[6]	Choi H J,Jung J H,Bae J,et al.Usefulness of early extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in colic patients with ureteral stones[J].Korean J Urol,2012,53(12):853-859.
[7]	Lulich J P,Osborne C A.Urolithiasis:past,present and future[J].J Small Anim Pract,2012,53(11):621-622.
[8]	Tarawneh E,Awad Z,Hani A,et al.Factors affecting urinary calculi treatment by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J].Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl,2010,21(4):660-665.
[9]	Kotur-Stevuljevic J,Simic-Ogrizovic S,Dopsaj V,et al.A hazardous link between malnutrition,inflammation and oxidative stress in renal patients[J].Clin Biohem,2012,45(15):1202-1205.
[10]	El-Nahas A R,El-Assmy A M,Awad B A,et al.Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones in pediatric patients:A multivariate analysis model for estimating the stone-free probability[J].Int J Urol,2013,20(12):1205-1210.
[11]	Pu Y R,Manousakas I,Liang S M,et al.Design of the dual stone locating system on an extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptor[J].Sensors(Basel),2013,13(1):1319-1328.
[12]	Phipps S,Stephenson C,Tolley D.Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones:the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates[J].BJU Int,2013,112(2):E129-133.
[13]	Dretler S P,Spencer B A.CT and stone fragility[J].J Endourol,2001,15(1):31-36.
[14]	Dretler S P,Polykoff G.Calcium oxalate stone morphology:fine tuning our therapeutic distinctions[J].J Urol,1996,155(3):828-833.
[15]	Bon D,Dore B,Irani J,et al.Radiographic prognostic criteria for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy:a study of 485 patients[J].Urology,1996,48(4):556-560.