“两点一线一面”的手术原则在钬激光前列腺剜除术中的应用研究

李凌, 彭泳涵, 王则宇, 等. “两点一线一面”的手术原则在钬激光前列腺剜除术中的应用研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 32(4): 250-254. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2017.04.002
引用本文: 李凌, 彭泳涵, 王则宇, 等. “两点一线一面”的手术原则在钬激光前列腺剜除术中的应用研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 32(4): 250-254. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2017.04.002
LI Ling, PENG Yonghan, WANG Zeyu, et al. Research on the effect of “two points,one border and one layer” principle on the holmium laser enucleation of prostate surgery[J]. J Clin Urol, 2017, 32(4): 250-254. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2017.04.002
Citation: LI Ling, PENG Yonghan, WANG Zeyu, et al. Research on the effect of “two points,one border and one layer” principle on the holmium laser enucleation of prostate surgery[J]. J Clin Urol, 2017, 32(4): 250-254. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2017.04.002

“两点一线一面”的手术原则在钬激光前列腺剜除术中的应用研究

详细信息
    通讯作者: 高小峰, E-mail:gxfdoc@sina.com
  • 中图分类号: R697.3

Research on the effect of “two points,one border and one layer” principle on the holmium laser enucleation of prostate surgery

More Information
  • 目的:探讨“两点一线一面”的手术原则在钬激光前列腺剜除术 (HoLEP) 中的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2015年6月2016年10月我院收治的BPH行HoLEP的患者临床资料, 所有患者均按照“两点一线一面”的剜除原则实施HoLEP。收集患者基础情况、围术期指标、术前术后排尿评价指标的变化以及手术并发症等资料, 评价按照“两点一线一面”的原则实施HoLEP的疗效。结果:研究共纳入78例患者。术前前列腺体积 (68.1±21.0) ml, 总体手术时间 (51.74±18.6) min, 剜除时间 (42.74±17.6) min, 组织粉碎时间 (8.2±7.5) min, 剜除速度 (1.4±0.4) g/min, 术后住院 (2.4±2.0) d。术后1个月随访表明, 前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 降低81.3%, 前列腺症状评分 (IPSS) 改善34.7%, 生活质量评分 (QOL) 提高57.1%, 最大尿流率 (Qmax) 上升97.8%, 剩余尿量 (PVR) 减少51.2%。拔管当日尿失禁发生率23.1% (18/78) , 其中14例为急迫性尿失禁, 4例为压力性尿失禁。术后1周时, 仅1例患者仍有轻度急迫性尿失禁;该患者通过提肛锻炼至术后3个月完全恢复。2例患者发生中叶轻度包膜穿孔;无严重出血并发症发生。结论:“两点一线一面”的剜除原则凝练了HoLEP手术方式的基本原则, 治疗前列腺增生安全、有效, 同时在又具有良好的灵活性操作性, 易于广大泌尿外科医师学习、掌握和推广。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Woodard T J, Manigault K R, McBurrows N N, et al.Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in older adults[J].Consult Pharm, 2016, 31 (8):412-424.

    [2]

    Vincent M W, Gilling P J.HoLEP has come of age[J].World J Urol, 2015, 33 (4):487-493.

    [3]

    Ruszat R, Seitz M, Wyler S F, et al.GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate:single-center experience and long-term results after 500 procedures[J].Eur Urol, 2008, 54 (4):893-901.

    [4]

    Lerner L B, Rajender A.Laser prostate enucleation techniques[J].Can J Urol, 2015, 22 (1):53-59.

    [5]

    Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, et al.EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction[J].Eur Urol, 2013, 64 (1):118-140.

    [6]

    Herrmann T R, Liatsikos E N, Nagele U, et al.EAU guidelines on laser technologies[J].Eur Urol, 2012, 61 (4):783-795.

    [7]

    Nickel J C, Saad F.The American Urological Association 2003guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia:a Canadian opinion[J].Can J Urol, 2004, 11 (2):2186-2193.

    [8]

    Gilling P J, Wilson L C, King C J, et al.Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate:results at 7years[J].BJU Int, 2012, 109 (3):408-411.

    [9]

    Razzak M.BPH:HoLEP——a steep learning curve but better for patients[J].Nat Rev Urol, 2013, 10 (2):66.

    [10]

    Cornu J N.Bipolar, monopolar, photovaporization of the prostate, or Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate:how to choose what's best?[J].Urol Clin North Am, 2016, 43 (3):377-384.

    [11]

    Brunckhorst O, Ahmed K, Nehikhare O, et al.Evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using multiple outcome measures[J].Urology, 2015, 86 (4):824-829.

    [12]

    Shah H N, Mahajan A P, Hegde S S, et al.Peri-operative complications of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate:experience in the first 280patients, and a review of literature[J].BJU Int, 2007, 100 (1):94-101.

    [13]

    Kahokehr A A, Gilling P J.Which laser works best for benign prostatic hyperplasia?[J].Curr Urol Rep, 2013, 14 (6):614-619.

    [14]

    Minagawa S, Okada S, Sakamoto H, et al.En-Bloc technique with anteroposterior dissection holmium laser enucleation of the prostate allows a short operative time and acceptable outcomes[J].Urology, 2015, 86 (3):628-633.

    [15]

    Scoffone C M, Cracco C M.The en-bloc no-touch holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) technique[J].World J Urol, 2016, 34 (8):1175-1181.

    [16]

    Ahyai S A, Chun F K, Lehrich K, et al.Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate and simple open prostatectomy——which procedure is faster?[J].J Urol, 2012, 187 (5):1608-1613.

    [17]

    Li S, Zeng X T, Ruan X L, et al.Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia:an updated systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis[J].PLoS One, 2014, 9 (7):e101615.

    [18]

    Elshal A M, Mekkawy R, Laymon M, et al.Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for treatment for largesized benign prostate hyperplasia;is it a realistic endourologic alternative in developing country?[J].World J Urol, 2016, 34 (3):399-405.

    [19]

    Takiuchi H, Nakao A, Ihara H.Prevention of transient urinary incontinence in peri-operative period of modified holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)[J].Hinyokika Kiyo, 2008, 54 (7):475-478.

    [20]

    Endo F, Shiga Y, Minagawa S, et al.Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP:a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence[J].Urology, 2010, 76 (6):1451-1455.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  222
  • PDF下载数:  536
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2017-02-14

目录