3D与2D腹腔镜下经腹膜外前列腺癌根治术疗效与安全性比较的Meta分析

范宁; 祁萍; 张丽秀; 桂惠明; 丁辉; 宁忠运; 王志平

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2018.08.010

3D与2D腹腔镜下经腹膜外前列腺癌根治术疗效与安全性比较的Meta分析

- 1. 兰州大学第二医院泌尿外科, 甘肃省泌尿系统疾病研究重点实验室, 甘肃省泌尿系统疾病临床医学中心(兰州, 730030);
- 2. 兰州大学第二医院检验科;
- 3. 甘肃省妇幼保健院临床检验中心
基金项目:
甘肃省自然科学基金(编号1606RJZA044)

详细信息

通讯作者: 王志平,E-mail:erywzp@lzu.edu.cn

中图分类号: R737.25

收稿日期: 2017-12-24

Comparison of efficacy and safety between using 3D and 2D extraperitoneal laparoscopic technique in radical prostatectomy:a meta-analysis

- 1. Department of Urology/Key Laboratory for Urological Diseases of Gansu Province/Clinical Center for Nephro-Urology of Gansu Province, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China;
- 2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University;
- 3. Department of Clinical Laboratory Center, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital

More Information

Corresponding author: WANG Zhiping, E-mail: erywzp@lzu.edu.cn

Received Date: 24 December 2017

摘要

摘要: 目的:使用Meta分析比较3D与2D腹腔镜下经腹膜外前列腺癌根治术的疗效与安全性。方法:检索各大数据库相关文献,由2名独立文献分析员进行质量评价及数据提取,利用Revman 5.3软件进行分析。结果:共纳入9篇文献,共705例患者。Meta分析结果显示:与2D腹腔镜比较,3D腹腔镜下经腹膜外前列腺癌根治术可以缩短手术时间(MD=-34.74,95%CI:-49.01^-20.46,P<0.000 01)、减少术中出血(MD=-48.53,95%CI:-63.31^-33.75,P<0.000 01)、缩短住院时间(MD=-0.96,95%CI:-1.87^-0.05,P=0.04)、减少手术并发症(OR=0.46,95%CI:0.22⁰.97,P=0.04)、提高术后控尿能力(OR=2.39,95%CI:1.48³.85,P=0.000 3)。结论:与2D腹腔镜比较,3D腹腔镜下经腹膜外前列腺癌根治术能够缩短手术时间、减少术中出血、缩短住院时间、减少术后并发症及提高术后控尿,但由于纳入文献较少且质量不高,需要更多高质量的随机对照研究以进一步证实该结论。
- 三维 /
- 腹腔镜 /
- 前列腺癌根治术 /
- 前列腺肿瘤 /
- Meta分析
Abstract: Objective:To compare efficacy and safety between 3D and 2D extraperitoneal laparoscopic technique used in radical prostatectomy.Method:We searched several databases to identify related studies.Two independent boffins were employed to carry out the quality evaluation and data extraction of the studies.Revman 5.3 software was used to process statistical analysis.Result:Finally, 9 studies were included with 705 cases.Statistical analysis showed that operative time was shortened (MD=-34.74, 95%CI:-49.01——20.46, P<0.000 01), intraoperative blood loss was reduced (MD=-48.53, 95%CI:-63.31——33.75, P<0.000 01), hospital stay was reduced (MD=-0.96, 95%CI:-1.87——0.05, P=0.04), surgical complications were reduced (OR=0.46, 95%CI:0.22-0.97, P=0.04), urinary continence was improved (OR=2.39, 95%CI:1.48-3.85, P=0.000 3) in 3D extraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery compared with control group.Conclusion:Compared with 2D procedure, 3D extraperitoneal laparoscopic assisted radical prostatectomy has advantages in terms of operation duration, blood loss, hospital stay, complications and urinary continence.However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials with large samples are required to provide further support to our findings.
- 3D /
- laparoscope /
- radical prostatectomy /
- prostate neoplasms /
- meta-analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	Chen W, Zheng R, Baade P D, et al.Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J].CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66 (2):115-132.
[2]	戴志红, 白杰, 高玉仁, 等.腹膜外途径腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术临床疗效分析及学习曲线探讨[J].临床泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 31 (8):723-726.
[3]	Wilhelm D, Reiser S, Kohn N, et al.Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3Dlaparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3Dpseudodisplay:even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D[J].Surg Endosc, 2014, 28 (8):2387-2397.
[4]	Lusch A, Bucur P L, Menhadji A D, et al.Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance[J].J Endourol, 2014, 28 (2):261-266.
[5]	Sorensen S M, Savran M M, Konge L, et al.Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy:a systematic review[J].Surg Endosc, 2016, 30 (1):11-23.
[6]	Aykan S, Singhal P, Nguyen D P, et al.Perioperative, pathologic, and early continence outcomes comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional display systems for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy——a retrospective, singlesurgeon study[J].J Endourol, 2014, 28 (5):539-543.
[7]	Bove P, Iacovelli V, Celestino F, et al.3Dvs 2Dlaparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer:comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates:a single cohort study[J].BMC Urol, 2015, 15:12.
[8]	Tang K Q, Pang S Y, Bao J M, et al.Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer:a retrospective cohort study[J].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao, 2017, 37 (1):1-5.
[9]	陈帆.3D腹腔镜和传统腹腔镜前列腺根治性切除术的对比研究[C].山东大学, 2016.
[10]	胡仁保, 王道虎.经腹膜外径路3D与2D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的疗效对比[J].安徽医学, 2016, 37 (4):444-446.
[11]	梁朝朝, 周骏, 叶元平, 等.3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的对比研究[J].现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志, 2014, 6 (3):150-153.
[12]	缪志俊.传统2D腹腔镜与3D腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治手术疗效比较[C].苏州大学, 2016.
[13]	徐东亮, 谈鸣岳, 何屹, 等.三孔法3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的初步比较研究[J].中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2016, 8 (2):71-75.
[14]	杨飞亚, 刘雍, 王梦童, 等.3D与2D腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术的临床疗效比较研究[J].临床泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 32 (6):447-450.
[15]	Calvano C J, Moran M E, Tackett L D, et al.New visualization techniques for in utero surgery:amnioscopy with a three-dimensional head-mounted display and a computer-controlled endoscope[J].J Endourol, 1998, 12 (5):407-410.
[16]	Wilhelm D, Reiser S, Kohn N, et al.Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3Dlaparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3Dpseudodisplay:even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D[J].Surg Endosc, 2014, 28 (8):2387-2397.
[17]	Kunert W, Storz P, Kirschniak A.For 3Dlaparoscopy:a step toward advanced surgical navigation:how to get maximum benefit from 3D vision[J].Surg Endosc, 2013, 27 (2):696-699.
[18]	Alaraimi B, EI Bakbak W, Sarker S, et al.A randomized prospective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three-dimensional (3D) vs.two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy[J].World J Surg, 2014, 38 (11):2746-2752.
[19]	Smith R, Schwab K, Day A, et al.Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons[J].Br J Surg, 2014, 101 (11):1453-1459.
[20]	Badani K K, Bhandari A, Tewari A, et al.Comparison of twodimensional and three-dimensional suturing:is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting?[J].J Endourol, 2005, 19 (10):1212-1215.
[21]	Ploussard G, de la Taille A, Moulin M, et al.Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J].Eur Urol, 2014, 65 (3):610-619.
[22]	Di Pierro G B, Baumeister P, Stucki P, et al.A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload[J].Eur Urol, 2011, 59 (1):1-6.
[23]	Kinoshita H, Nakagawa K, Usui Y, et al.High-definition resolution three-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:randomized comparative study with high-definition resolution two-dimensional systems[J].Surg Endosc, 2015, 29 (8):2203-2209.