荧光辅助腹腔镜Madigan术治疗良性前列腺增生疗效分析

洪谦; 张志强; 张志辉; 王进有; 邢伟阳; 田齐星; 叶青林; 于德新; 谢栋栋

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2020.05.012

荧光辅助腹腔镜Madigan术治疗良性前列腺增生疗效分析

- 安徽医科大学第二附属医院泌尿外科(合肥, 230601)
基金项目:
安徽省高校自然科学研究项目(No:KJ2019A0255)

详细信息

通讯作者: 谢栋栋,E-mail:xiedd_urology@163.com

中图分类号: R697

收稿日期: 2019-09-19

Therapeutic effect of fluorescence-assisted laparoscopic Madigan on benign prostatic hyperplasia

- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, China

More Information

Corresponding author: XIE Dongdong, E-mail: xiedd_urology@163.com

Received Date: 19 September 2019

摘要

摘要: 目的:观察荧光辅助腹腔镜Madigan术对于良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效,评价其在保留尿道和术后正常射精功能中的价值。方法:28例BPH患者分成两组,14例行经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)为对照组,14例行荧光辅助腹腔镜Madigan术为观察组。术后随访3个月,比较两组患者临床资料和术前、术后残余尿量(RUV)、最大尿流率(Q_max)、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、男性性健康问卷-射精障碍评分(MSHQ-EJD)的差异。结果:两组患者年龄、BMI、前列腺体积、术前RUV、Q_max、IPSS评分、QOL评分、MSHQ-EJD评分比较差异无统计学意义,观察组手术时间长于对照组,术后膀胱冲洗时间及留置尿管时间少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后RUV、IPSS评分比较差异无统计学意义,术后Q_max、QOL评分和MSHQ-EJD评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组术后射精功能明显优于对照组。结论:荧光辅助腹腔镜Madigan术比TURP能更好地保护尿道完整性,改善患者术后射精功能障碍问题,提高患者生活质量,值得临床推广。
- 保留尿道 /
- 射精功能 /
- 荧光腹腔镜 /
- Madigan术
Abstract: Objective: To observe the efficacy of fluorescence-assisted laparoscopic Madigan prostatectomy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) and to evaluate its value in preservation of the prostatic urethra and ejaculation function. Method: Twenty-eight patients with BPH were divided into two groups. Fourteen patients in the control group were treated with transurethral resection of prostate(TURP), while other 14 patients in the observation group were treated with fluorescence-assisted laparoscopic Madigan prostatectomy. Patients in the two groups were followed up for 3 months,and the clinical data, preoperative and postoperative residual urine volume(RUV), maximum urine flow rate(Q_max), International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS), quality of life score(QOL), and male sexual health questionnaire on EJD(MSHQ-EJD) were compared. Result: There was no significant difference in age, BMI, prostate volume, preoperative RUV, Q_max, IPSS, QOL score or MSHQ-EJD between the two groups. The operation time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group, but the duration of continuous bladder irrigation and indwelling catheter was shorter than that of the control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative RUV or IPSS between the two groups, but there was statistically significant difference in postoperative Q_max, QOL and MSHQ-EJD. Meanwhile, the ejaculation function of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group.Conclusion: Compared with TURP, fluorescence-assisted laparoscopic Madigan prostatectomy can better protect the integrity of urethra and improve the ejaculation function and quality of life of patients, so it's worthy of clinical promotion.
- preservation of urethra /
- ejaculatory function /
- fluorescence-assisted laparoscopy /
- Madigan surgery

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

[1]	Steven A.Kaplan.Transurethral resection of the prostate——is our gold standard still a precious commodity?[J].J Uro,2008,180(1):15-16.
[2]	Dixon AR,Lord PH.The Madigan prostatectomy[J].J Urology,1990,144(6):1401-1403.
[3]	李文华,苏中选.Madigan前列腺切除术[J].航空航天医药,2001,12(3):133-135.
[4]	Sotelo RJ,Astigueta JC,Desai MM,et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery simple prostatectomy:initial report[J].Urology,2009,74(3):626-630.
[5]	McCullough TC,Heldwein FL,Soon SJ,et al.Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy:an evaluation of morbidity[J].J Endourol,2009,23(1):129-133.
[6]	Schols RM,Connell NJ.Near-infrared fluorescence imaging for real-time intraoperative anatomical guidance in minimally invasive surgery:a systematic review of the literature[J].World J Surg,2015,39(5):1069-1079.
[7]	De Boer E,Harlaar NJ,Taruttis A,et al.Optical innovations in surgery[J].Br J Surg,2015,102(2):e56-e72.
[8]	Namikawa T,Sato T,Hanazaki K.Recent advances in near-infrared fluorescence-guided imaging surgery using indocyanine green[J].Surg Today,2015,45:1467-1474.
[9]	Boni L,David G,Mangano A,et al.Clinical applications of indocyanine green(ICG)enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic surgery[J].Surg Endosc,2015,29(7):2046-2055.
[10]	那彦群,叶章群,孙颖浩,等.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南手册2014版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:830.
[11]	孙自学,宋春生,邢俊平,等.良性前列腺增生中西医结合诊疗指南(试行版)[J].中华男科学杂志,2017,23(3):280-285.
[12]	Chapple CR,Roehrborn CG.A shifted paradigm for the further understanding,evaluation,and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men:focus on the bladder[J].Eur Urol,2006,49(4):651-658.
[13]	Terai Akito,Ichioka Kentaro,Matsui Yoshiyuki,et al.Association of lower urinary tract symptoms with erectile dysfunction in Japanese men[J].Urology,2004,64:132-136.
[14]	梁国庆,孙建明.良性前列腺增生的腔内手术治疗进展[J].中国性科学,2017,26(9):26-28.
[15]	Tasci AI,Ilbey YO,Tugcu V,et al.Transurethral resection of the prostate with monopolar resectoscope:single-surgeon experience and long-term results of after 3589 procedures[J].Urology,2011,78(5):1151-1155.
[16]	Bell JR,Laborde E.Update on the sexual impact of treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Curr Urol Rep,2012,13(6):433-440.
[17]	Pavone C,Abbadessa D,Scaduto G,et al.Sexual dysfunctions after transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP):evidence from a retrospective study on 264 patients[J].Arch Ital Urol Androl,2015,87(1):8-13.
[18]	胡啸天,曾晓勇,叶章群.外科治疗对良性前列腺增生患者性功能的影响[J].现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志,2012,4(2):118-120.
[19]	Carmignani L,Bozzini G,Macchi A,et al.Sexual outcome of patients undergoing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Asian J Androl,2015,17(5):802-806.
[20]	邢念增,康宁,闫勇,等.腹腔镜下耻骨后腹膜外保留尿道的前列腺切除术[J].中国男科学杂志,2007,21(9):19-21.
[21]	杨飞亚,邢念增,王建文,等.腹腔镜下耻骨后腹膜外保留尿道前列腺切除术[J].北京大学学报:医学版,2010,42(4):469-472.
[22]	Simone G,Misuraca L,Anceschi U,et al.Urethra and Ejaculation Preserving Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy:Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging-guided Madigan Technique[J].Eur Urol,2019,75:492-497.