局麻经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石

翟建坡, 刘宁, 王海, 等. 局麻经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 35(8): 635-637. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2020.08.009
引用本文: 翟建坡, 刘宁, 王海, 等. 局麻经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 35(8): 635-637. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2020.08.009
ZHAI Jianpo, LIU Ning, WANG Hai, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local infiltration anesthesia for upper urinary calculi[J]. J Clin Urol, 2020, 35(8): 635-637. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2020.08.009
Citation: ZHAI Jianpo, LIU Ning, WANG Hai, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local infiltration anesthesia for upper urinary calculi[J]. J Clin Urol, 2020, 35(8): 635-637. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2020.08.009

局麻经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石

详细信息
    通讯作者: 王海,E-mail:Wanghai73@sina.com
  • 中图分类号: R692.4

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local infiltration anesthesia for upper urinary calculi

More Information
  • 目的:筛选局麻经皮肾镜取石术的最佳适应人群。方法:收集我院泌尿外科2015年6月~2018年6月收治的肾或者输尿管结石,并行局麻经皮肾镜取石术的患者,共计226例。观察患者术中及术后的疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog pain scale,VAS)、手术结石清除率和手术并发症。并对术中VAS进行亚组分析。结果:患者在通道建立时疼痛最明显,VAS评分为3.2分。通道建立的VAS评分在高年龄(≥54岁)组为3分,在低年龄(<54岁)组为3.4分。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)。VAS评分在肾结石组为3.1分,在输尿管结石组为3.2分,在复杂结石组为3.7分。3组之间两两比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)。VAS评分在单通道组为3分,在双通道组为3.2分,在三通道组为3.8分。3组之间两两比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.01)。本组患者经皮肾镜取石术的一期清石率在输尿管结石组为100%,在肾结石组为95%,在复杂性结石组为91%。2例患者需要输血,1例患者发生感染休克,无胸膜损伤和结肠损伤等发生,无围手术期死亡患者。结论:局麻能为经皮肾镜取石术提供良好的镇痛效果,尤其适用于单通道就可处理的肾盂或者输尿管单发结石。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Zeng G,Mai Z,Xia S,et al.Prevalence of kidney stones in China:an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study[J].BJU Int,2017,120(1):109-116.

    [2]

    Ghani KR,Andonian S,Bultitude M,et al.Percutaneous nephrolithotomy:update,trends,and future directions[J].Eur Urol,2016,70(2):382-396.

    [3]

    Nouralizadeh A,Ziaee SA,Hosseini sharifi SH,et al.Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal versus general anesthesia:a randomized clinical trial[J].J Endourol,2013,27(8):974-978.

    [4]

    Pu CX,Wang J,Tang Y,et al.The efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus regional anesthesia:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Urolithiasis,2015,43(5):455-466.

    [5]

    Ecke TH,Barski D,Weingart G,et al.Presentation of a method at the Exploration Stage according to IDEAL:Percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL)under local infiltrative anesthesia is a feasible and effective method-retrospective analysis of 439 patients[J].Int J Med Sci,2017,14(4):302-309.

    [6]

    Li H,Xu K,Li B,Chen B,et al.Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local infiltration anesthesia:a single-center experience of 2000 Chinese cases[J].Urology,2013,82(5):1020-1025.

    [7]

    宋小松,甘艺平,余强国,等.局部浸润麻醉下侧卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术38例观察[J].重庆医学,2011,40(33):3366-3367,3369.

    [8]

    Rizvi SA,Hussain M,Askari SH,et al.Surgical outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 3402 patients and results of stone analysis in 1559 patients[J].BJU Int,2017,120(5):702-709.

    [9]

    Armitage JN,Irving SO,Burgess NA,et al.Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United Kingdom:results of a prospective data registry[J].Eur Urol,2012,61(6):1188-1193.

    [10]

    Aravantinos E,Karatzas A,Gravas S,et al.Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under assisted local anaesthesia:a prospective study on selected patients with upper urinary tract obstruction[J].Eur Urol,2007,51(1):224-227.

    [11]

    Dalela D,Goel A,Singh P,et al.Renal capsular block:a novel method for performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local anesthesia[J].J Endourol,2004,18(6):544-546.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  173
  • PDF下载数:  282
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2019-11-03

目录