-
摘要: 目的:探讨硕通镜治疗输尿管石街的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2018年3月—2020年3月在我院采用硕通镜下钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管石街患者的临床资料。患者共12例,男8例,女4例;年龄25~62岁,中位年龄44岁;输尿管石街长5.2~10.8 cm,平均7.4 cm。观察一期手术成功率、手术时间、结石清除率、术中及术后并发症发生情况。结果:12例患者均一期顺利完成手术,手术时间40~100 min,平均60 min,术中未发生肾盂输尿管黏膜穿孔、撕脱、断裂以及大出血、感染性休克等严重并发症。术后住院时间1~3 d,平均1.5 d,1例术后出现发热,对症治疗后痊愈,无其他术后并发症发生。术后第1天和术后1个月的清石率分别为83%和92%。术后1个月均顺利拔除双J管,复查彩超肾积水较术前减轻,未见肾周积液及血肿形成。复查肾功能较术前改善。结论:硕通镜治疗输尿管石街安全、有效。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of ureteral stone street by Shuo Tong ureteroscopy.Methods: The clinical data of patients with ureteral stone street treated by Shuo Tong ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy in our hospital from March 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 cases, 8 males and 4 females, aged between 25 and 62 years, with a median age of 44 years. The length of ureteral stone street was 5.2-10.8 cm, with an average length of 7.4 cm. The success rate, operation time, stone removal rate, intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed.Results: All the 12 patients were completed the operation successfully in the first stage. The operation time was 40-100 min, with an average of 60 min, and no serious complications such as perforation, avulsion, rupture of renal pelvis or ureter mucosa, massive hemorrhage or septic shock occurred during the operation. Postoperative hospitalization time was 1-3 days, with an average of 1.5 days. One patient had postoperative fever which was cured after symptomatic treatment, and no other postoperative complications occurred. The stone removal rates were 83% and 92%, respectively. The double J tubes were removed successfully one month after the operation, and the hydronephrosis was alleviated by color ultrasound reexamination compared with that before the operation. No perirenal effusion or hematoma formation was observed. Renal function was improved after re-examination.Conclusion: Shuo tong ureteroscopy is safe and effective in the treatment of ureteral stone street.
-
Key words:
- Shuo Tong ureteroscopy /
- ureteral stone street /
- holmium laser
-
-
[1] Parr JM,Desai D,Winkle D.Natural history and quality of life in patients with cystine urolithiasis:a single centre study[J].BJU Int,2015,116(S3):31-35.
[2] Chi T,Usawachintachit M,Filippou P,et al.Significant differences in struvite and cystine stone frequency seen among Chinese nephrolithiasis patients living in North America compared to those living in China[J].Transl Androl Urol,2016,5(3):375-380.
[3] Kirkali Z,Rasooly R,Star RA,et al.Urinary Stone Disease:Progress,Status,and Needs[J].Urology,2015,86(4):651-653.
[4] Scales CD Jr,Krupski TL,Curtis LH,et al.Practice variation in the surgical management of urinary lithiasis[J].J Urol,2011,186(1):146-150.
[5] 朱池海,廖邦华,朱育春.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术后石街的发生率及其危险因素分析[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2015,20(8):561-565.
[6] 王树声,翁湘涛,周均洪,等.硕通镜治疗上尿路结石的有效性与安全性[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2017,38(9):671-674.
[7] Giustia G,Proiettiac S,Villabc L,et al.Current Standard Technique for Modern Flexible Ureteroscopy:Tips and Tricks[J].Eur Urol,2016,70(1):188-194.
[8] 罗生军,袁野,胡豪,等.硕通镜与输尿管软镜治疗单侧上尿路结石的效果分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2019,41(21):2101-2106.
[9] 熊波波,张劲松,李宁,等.硕通镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效研究[J].重庆医学,2020,49(16):2698-2705.
[10] Xu Y,Min ZQ,Wan SP,et al.Complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery classified by the modified Clavien grading system[J].Urolithiasis,2018,46(2):197-202.
[11] 朱贤鑫,宋乐明,杜传策,等.智能控压输尿管软镜吸引取石术的疗效分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2018,39(4):256-260.
[12] 杨嗣星,郑府,柯芹,等.软性输尿管镜碎石术中肾盂内压力监测方法及意义[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2014,35(8):575-578.
[13] 甘澍,周均洪,廖芝健,等.负压组合镜治疗肾结石的临床观察[J].临床外科杂志,2017,25(2):104-106.
[14] 熊波波,张劲松,李宁,等.硕通镜和输尿管镜钬激光在输尿管上段感染性结石疗效对比[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2020,35(7):67-71.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 473
- PDF下载数: 237
- 施引文献: 0
下载: