彩色多普勒超声在降低经皮肾镜取石术出血以及术后住院天数的意义

马璐, 钱海宁, 徐安, 等. 彩色多普勒超声在降低经皮肾镜取石术出血以及术后住院天数的意义[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 39(4): 345-348. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2024.04.016
引用本文: 马璐, 钱海宁, 徐安, 等. 彩色多普勒超声在降低经皮肾镜取石术出血以及术后住院天数的意义[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 39(4): 345-348. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2024.04.016
MA Lu, QIAN Haining, XU An, et al. Significance of color Doppler ultrasound guidance for reducing bleeding and postoperative hospital stay during percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. J Clin Urol, 2024, 39(4): 345-348. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2024.04.016
Citation: MA Lu, QIAN Haining, XU An, et al. Significance of color Doppler ultrasound guidance for reducing bleeding and postoperative hospital stay during percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. J Clin Urol, 2024, 39(4): 345-348. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2024.04.016

彩色多普勒超声在降低经皮肾镜取石术出血以及术后住院天数的意义

详细信息

Significance of color Doppler ultrasound guidance for reducing bleeding and postoperative hospital stay during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

More Information
  • 目的 探究B超联合彩色多普勒超声引导穿刺在降低经皮肾镜取石术(percutaneous nephrolithotomy,PCNL)术出血以及术后住院天数的意义。方法 回顾性分析2021年6月—2023年6月上海交通大学医学院附属同仁医院收治的120例肾结石和或输尿管上段结石行PCNL的患者临床资料。根据引导穿刺方式的不同,分为单纯B超灰阶扫描引导穿刺组(B超组)及B超联合彩色多普勒引导穿刺组(彩超组),比较2组的临床资料以及手术并发症,尤其是手术出血和术后住院天数。结果 B超组和彩超组患者的年龄[(54.110±11.218)岁vs (53.001±12.575)岁]、结石大小[(622.074±59.433) mm2 vs (678.125±52.834) mm2]、手术时间[(87.483±21.558) min vs (86.217±24.399) min]、手术通道[(1.150±0.360)个vs (1.183±0.390)个]、术前血红蛋白[(136.651±15.713) g/L vs (135.301±13.982) g/L]及术后血红蛋白[(123.533±14.623) g/L vs (126.166±13.176) g/L]比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在术后住院天数[(7.250±1.997) d vs (6.150±1.176) d]和血红蛋白下降[(13.117±9.106) g/L vs (9.133±6.588) g/L]比较中,2组差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 B超联合彩色多普勒引导穿刺可实时监视并避开肾脏较大的血管,可明显降低PCNL出血以及术后住院天数。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  临床病例特征 

    项目 B超组
    (60例)
    彩超组
    (60例)
    性别
       男 47 44
       女 13 16
    肾结石 50 52
    输尿管上段结石 5 4
    肾结石合并输尿管结石 5 4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  2组观察指标比较 X±S

    指标 B超组(60例) 彩超组(60例) t P
    年龄/岁 54.110±11.218 53.001±12.575 0.506 0.305
    结石大小/mm2 622.074±59.433 678.125±52.834 -0.213 0.642
    手术时间/min 87.483±21.558 86.217±24.399 0.301 0.256
    手术通道/个 1.150±0.360 1.183±0.390 -0.468 0.331
    术后住院天数/d 7.250±1.997 6.150±1.176 3.676 0.038
    术前血红蛋白/(g/L) 136.651±15.713 135.301±13.982 0.497 0.529
    术后血红蛋白/(g/L) 123.533±14.623 126.166±13.176 -1.036 0.419
    血红蛋白下降/(g/L) 13.117±9.106 9.133±6.588 2.745 0.016
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Lang J, Narendrula A, El-Zawahry A, et al. Global trends in incidence and burden of urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of global burden of disease study data[J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2022, 35: 37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.008

    [2]

    Antoniou V, Gauhar V, Kallidonis P, et al. Education and training evolution in urolithiasis: a perspective from European School of Urology[J]. Asian J Urol, 2023, 10(3): 281-288. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.01.004

    [3]

    Tempo JA, Williams GM, Robertson IK, et al. Assessing the variability of the twelfth rib as a landmark for percutaneous nephrolithotomy using computed tomography[J]. Res Rep Urol, 2023, 15: 355-363.

    [4]

    Tsai SH, Chung HJ, Tseng PT, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Medicine, 2020, 99(10): e19403. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019403

    [5]

    Griffiths L, Aro T, Samson P, et al. Prospective randomized trial of antibiotic prophylaxis duration for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in low-risk patients[J]. J Endourol, 2023, 37(10): 1075-1080. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0678

    [6]

    Sakly A, Zakhama W, Jleli N, et al. Kidney stone management in the era of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does it improve safety?a prospective cohort study[J]. Ann Med Surg, 2023, 85(5): 1502-1506. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000576

    [7]

    Nayyar R, Sachan A, Aggarwal N, et al. Anatomical approach to PCNL: concept of ideal puncture zone in a 3D perspective[J]. Urolithiasis, 2023, 51(1): 99. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01477-9

    [8]

    Choudhury S, Sinha Roy PP, Pal DK. Calcutta position: a new modified supine decubitus for supine PCNL[J]. Urologia, 2023: 3915603231191268.

    [9]

    Arabzadeh Bahri R, Maleki S, Shafiee A, et al. Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2023, 18(3): e0276708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276708

    [10]

    Birowo P, Raharja PAR, Putra HWK, et al. X-ray-free ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study with historical control[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2020, 52(12): 2253-2259. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02577-w

    [11]

    Xu CC, Feng S, Lin CX, et al. Reducing postoperative morbidity of mini-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: would it help if blood vessels are left unharmed during puncture?A CONSORT-prospective randomized trial[J]. Medicine, 2018, 97(47): e13314. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013314

    [12]

    Akin Y, Basara I, Yucel S, et al. Is tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy really less injurious than standard in the midterm?[J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27(10): 1192-1196. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0151

    [13]

    Hosseini SR, Tehranipour E, Khadem A, et al. Three-dimensional virtual reconstruction method versus standard fluoroscopy as a guiding tool for an optimal puncture rout in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized trial study[J]. Urol J, 2023.

    [14]

    Pan SY, Huang CP, Chen WC, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined antegrade flexible ureteroscope for complete staghorn stones: a case report of a new concept of stone surgery[J]. Medicina, 2022, 59(1): 35. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010035

    [15]

    Jamil MN, Haq FU, Islam EU, et al. Comparison between supine position versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single centered analysis of 623 cases[J]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2022, 34(Suppl 4): S1003-S1007.

    [16]

    Zhu XS, Yin XY, Fu DH, et al. Application of image overlapping in percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2023, 55(12): 3057-3063. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03751-6

    [17]

    戚宇诚, 林方优, 李柏均, 等. 基于肾脏血管解剖建立经皮肾通道的临床研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 38(1): 10-14. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.01.003

    [18]

    Birowo P, Raharja PAR, Putra HWK, et al. X-ray-free ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position using alken metal telescoping dilators in a large kidney stone: a case report[J]. Res Rep Urol, 2020, 12: 287-293.

    [19]

    Gao KY, Li SS, Raj A, et al. A 3D printing personalized percutaneous puncture guide access plate for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a pilot study[J]. BMC Urol, 2021, 21(1): 184. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00945-x

    [20]

    卞少华, 李颖毅, 张辉, 等. 辅助可视超微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性肾下盏结石的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 37(3): 168-171. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2022.03.002

    [21]

    Shi Y, Yang X, Mathis BJ, et al. Can color Doppler ultrasound challenge the paradigm in percutaneous nephrolithotomy?[J]. J Endourol, 2022, 36(3): 373-380. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0368

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  235
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-08-16
刊出日期:  2024-04-06

返回顶部

目录