输尿管支架管设计现状和进展

贾其磊; 黄文

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2024.10.017

输尿管支架管设计现状和进展

贾其磊^1,2, ,,
黄文²

- 1.
  成都市青白江区人民医院泌尿外科(成都，610300)
- 2.
  成都大学护理学院

详细信息

通讯作者: 贾其磊，E-mail：jiaqileimail@163.com

中图分类号: R699.1

收稿日期: 2023-10-18

刊出日期: 2024-10-06

Current status and progress in the design of ureteral stents

JIA Qilei^1,2, ,,
HUANG Wen²

- 1.
  Department of Urology, People's Hospital of Qingbaijiang District, Chengdu, 610300, China
- 2.
  School of Nursing, Chengdu University

More Information

Corresponding author: JIA Qilei, E-mail: jiaqileimail@163.com

Received Date: 18 October 2023

Publish Date: 06 October 2024

摘要

摘要: 输尿管支架管是泌尿外科医师的常用耗材，对泌尿系结石和肾盂输尿管的重建性手术后康复有重要意义。输尿管支架管置入后可能引起许多支架相关症状，严重影响患者的生活质量和体验感。本文综述了输尿管支架的起源和历史变革，输尿管支架管在尾端形状、如何便于移除的策略、抗反流技术、主干改变的进展、合适的直径及长度变化等方面的创新，笔者自己的创新设计。讨论了这些设计改进对支架相关症状的影响，并提供了未来输尿管支架管设计可能的发展方向，旨在帮助临床医师更有效地满足多样化的临床需求，正确选择和使用输尿管支架管。
- 输尿管支架管 /
- 支架管相关症状 /
- 设计 /
- 形状 /
- 并发症
Abstract: Ureteral stents are common surgical instruments used in clinical practice by urologists. Many urological surgeries require the use of ureteral stents, including almost all cases of urinary tract stone surgery, reconstruction surgery of the renal pelvis and ureter, which is of great significance for the recovery of patients. The placement of ureteral stents in the body may cause many stent-related symptoms, seriously affecting the patient's quality of life and experience. This article reviews the early design and evolution history of ureteral stents, innovations in the shape of the tail end, strategies for easy removal, anti reflux technology design, progress in main stem design, changes in diameter and length of ureteral stents, and the author's own innovative design. We discussed the impact of these design schemes and improvement measures on stent-related symptoms, and provided possible development directions for future ureteral stent design, aiming to help clinical physicians better choose and use ureteral stents, and more effectively meet the personalized clinical needs of patients.
- ureteral stent /
- stent-related symptoms /
- design /
- shape /
- complication

HTML全文

参考文献(49)

[1]	Lee J, Katz M, Shah O. Developments in ureteral stent technology[J]. Front Surg, 2021, 8: 764167. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.764167
[2]	Forbes C, Scotland KB, Lange D, et al. Innovations in ureteral stent technology[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2019, 46(2): 245-255. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.12.013
[3]	Hu K, Hou ZP, Huang YB, et al. Recent development and future application of biodegradable ureteral stents[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2024, 12: 1373130. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1373130
[4]	Mawhorter M, Streeper NM. Advances in ureteral stent technology[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2022, 32(4): 415-419. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001003
[5]	Vogt B, Desgrippes A, Desfemmes FN. Changing the double-pigtail stent by a new suture stent to improve patient's quality of life: a prospective study[J]. World J Urol, 2015, 33(8): 1061-1068. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1394-2
[6]	Bosio A, Ferretti S, Alessandria E, et al. Patients undergoing double J substitution with a pigtail suture stent report a significant decrease of stent-related symptoms. Results from a prospective multicenter longitudinal trial[J]. World J Urol, 2024, 42(1): 186. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04879-5
[7]	Bostanci Y, Mercimek MN, Gulsen M, et al. Clinical effectiveness of single pigtail suture stent on patient comfort: a double-blind prospective randomized trial[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(11): 1183-1188. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0127
[8]	Betschart P, Piller A, Zumstein V, et al. Reduction of stent-associated morbidity by minimizing stent material: a prospective, randomized, single-blind superiority trial assessing a customized 'suture stent'[J]. BJU Int, 2021, 127(5): 596-605. doi: 10.1111/bju.15290
[9]	Majdalany SE, Aldoukhi AH, Jung H, et al. In vivo evaluation of a novel pigtail suture stent[J]. Urology, 2021, 148: 83-87. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.11.031
[10]	Bosio A, Alessandria E, Agosti S, et al. Pigtail suture stents significantly reduce stent-related symptoms compared to conventional double J stents: a prospective randomized trial[J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2021, 29: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.03.011
[11]	Shah M, Pillai S, Chawla A, et al. A randomized trial investigating clinical outcomes and stent-related symptoms after placement of a complete intra-ureteric stent on a string versus conventional stent placement[J]. BJU Int, 2022, 129(3): 373-379. doi: 10.1111/bju.15540
[12]	Ho CH, Liu SP, Wang CW, et al. Complete intraureteral stent placement reduces stent-related symptoms: Systemic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2022, 121(11): 2308-2316. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.06.014
[13]	Bosio A, Alessandria E, Agosti SC, et al. Loop-tail stents fail in reducing stent-related symptoms: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial[J]. BJU Int, 2022, 129(1): 123-129. doi: 10.1111/bju.15395
[14]	Chalhoub M, Kohaut J, Vinit N, et al. Feasibility and safety of magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent insertion and removal in children[J]. World J Urol, 2021, 39(5): 1649-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03339-0
[15]	O'Kelly JA, Haroon UM, Rauf AJ, et al. Ureteric stenting with magnetic retrieval: an alternative to traditional methods[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2020, 189(1): 289-293. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02075-8
[16]	Kapoor A, Akerman J, Wong ECL, et al. Comparison of a magnetic retrieval device vs. flexible cystoscopy for removal of ureteral stents in renal transplant patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2021, 15(2): E97-E102.
[17]	Zeng SH, Liu B, Hu H, et al. The function improved of the newly designed magnetic-end ureteric stenting retrieval device: a clinical prospective randomized and control trial in a multicenter study[J]. Contrast Media Mol Imaging, 2022, 2022: 4107491. doi: 10.1155/2022/4107491
[18]	Lyons L, Kinnear N, Hennessey D. A systematic review of magnetic versus conventional ureteric stents for short term ureteric stenting[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2022, 191(6): 2763-2769. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-02920-3
[19]	Cheng C, Ma YC, Jin SD, et al. Comparison of the removal efficiency and safety of magnetic versus conventional ureteral stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2023, 52: 22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.004
[20]	Brillat Arce W, Vuille-Dit-Bille RN, Holland-Cunz SG, et al. Magnetic double-J-stent removal without general anaesthesia in children[J]. Urology, 2021, 156: 251-255. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.028
[21]	Li JQ, Gauhar V, Lim EJ, et al. Safety and effectiveness of magnetic ureteric stent removal under ultrasound control: a randomized single center trial[J]. World J Urol, 2023, 41(11): 2889-2896. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04437-5
[22]	Damodaran V, Els B, Daras E, et al. The "ins and outs" of the magnetic ureteral stent: a novel innovation in Endourology[J]. Curr Urol, 2023, 17(2): 92-99. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000104
[23]	Liu JL, Cundy TP, Parker N, et al. Implementing routine use of self-removed ureteric stents on extraction strings: prospective patient-reported outcome measures and complications[J]. World J Urol, 2023, 41(12): 3759-3764. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04653-z
[24]	Hu WG, Song YJ, Li Y, et al. Novel method to decrease the exposure time of the extraction string of the ureteral stent and its efficiency and safety verification in the clinic[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 22358. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01821-2
[25]	Batie SF, Coco CT, Reddy S, et al. Ureteral stent extraction strings in children: Stratifying the risk of post operative urinary tract infection[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2023, 19(5): 515. e1-515. e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.05.017
[26]	杨靖, 王建平, 颜晓琦, 等. 输尿管支架导致膀胱输尿管反流的机制及防治对策研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2023, 63(19): 103-107.
[27]	de la Cruz JE, Fernández I, Sanz-Migueláñez JL, et al. Assessment of the grades of vesicoureteral reflux in stented ureters: an experimental study[J]. Urol Int, 2021, 105(7-8): 554-559. doi: 10.1159/000515613
[28]	Chang JW, Kuo FC, Lin TC, et al. Long-term complications and outcomes of augmentation cystoplasty in children with neurogenic bladder[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 4214. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54431-z
[29]	Zhang YQ, Chen CQ, Hu W, et al. Antireflux ureteral stent improves stent-related symptoms and quality of life: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. J Endourol, 2023, 37(7): 761-767.
[30]	韩孝洲, 刘剑新, 邱瑾, 等. 输尿管镜碎石术后留置防逆流输尿管支架管的临床价值[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 38(4): 297-299, 304. https://lcmw.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.04.012
[31]	Lee JH, Sung J, Jo JK, et al. 3D-printing-assisted extraluminal anti-reflux diodes for preventing vesicoureteral reflux through double-J stents[J]. Int J Bioprint, 2022, 8(2): 549. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i2.549
[32]	Callegari M, Patel A, Drozd A, et al. Novel Antireflux "RELIEF" Stent to Prevent Vesicoureteral Reflux[J]. Urology, 2024, 187: 100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.032
[33]	Kim KW, Park SH, Im G, et al. CFD study on vesicoureteral reflux in the urinary tract with double J stent[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2022, 145: 105456. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105456
[34]	Adhoni MZU, Al Homsi A, Ali Z, et al. Antireflux ureteral stents prevent stent-related symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(11): e49375.
[35]	Bellos TC, Katsimperis SN, Tzelves LI, et al. Ureteral stents: a brief narrative review of the different polymeric types, their characteristics, and their connection to stent-related symptoms[J]. Urol Ann, 2023, 15(4): 360-367. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_39_23
[36]	Nestler S, Witte B, Schilchegger L, et al. Size does matter: ureteral stents with a smaller diameter show advantages regarding urinary symptoms, pain levels and general health[J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(4): 1059-1063. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02829-0
[37]	Moataz A, Gallouo M, Mawuko-Gadosseh Y, et al. Evaluation of the tolerance of the ureteral catheter JJ by the use of the USSQ self-questionnaire[J]. Prog Urol, 2021, 31(2): 85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.05.012
[38]	Kim KW, Kim HH, Choi YH, et al. Urine flow analysis using double J stents of various sizes in in vitro ureter models[J]. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng, 2020, 36(2): e3294. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3294
[39]	Zeng X, Xiao B, Hu WG, et al. A modified triangular Double-J stent for retrograde intrarenal surgery improvement of free-stone rate, and quality of life: a randomized controlled, multiple centers, perspective trial[J]. World J Urol, 2023, 41(6): 1653-1658. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04392-1
[40]	Bernasconi V, Tozzi M, Pietropaolo A, et al. Comprehensive overview of ureteral stents based on clinical aspects, material and design[J]. Cent European J Urol, 2023, 76(1): 49-56.
[41]	Alobaidy A, Ibrahim T, El Ansari W, et al. Grooved vs smooth ureteric stent before extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: Single-blind randomised clinical trial[J]. Arab J Urol, 2022, 20(1): 41-48. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.2004502
[42]	Zheng SK, Obrist D, Burkhard F, et al. Fluid mechanical performance of ureteral stents: The role of side hole and lumen size[J]. Bioeng Transl Med, 2023, 8(2): e10407. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10407
[43]	王荣, 许斌. 两种支架对中青年男性输尿管钬激光碎石术后勃起功能和生活质量影响的对比分析[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2020, 26(1): 48-53.
[44]	Aksakalli T, Adanur S, Demirdogen SO, et al. Allium^® ureteral stent, a new player in the treatment of ureteral stenosis: a prospective cohort study[J]. Actas Urol Esp, 2023, 47(9): 598-604. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2023.05.008
[45]	Sharma R, Lee S, Bhatti P, et al. Proximal migration of ureteral stent with ureteric obstruction after kidney transplant[J]. Exp Clin Transplant, 2022, 20(7): 687-690. doi: 10.6002/ect.2021.0040
[46]	毕玉行, 王永传, 都靖, 等. 输尿管镜体测量法指导双J管留置的临床疗效观察[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 38(11): 875-879. https://lcmw.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.11.014
[47]	Bao XJ, Sun FZ, Yao HB, et al. Distal end of Double-J ureteral stent position on ureteral stent-related symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 990049. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.990049
[48]	Janssen P, Tailly T. New stent technologies[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2022, 49(1): 185-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.08.004
[49]	贾其磊. 节段型输尿管支架管: CN114392005A[P]. 2022-04-26.