机器人自主手术研究现状及展望

张旭; 马鑫; 贾通宇; 钟仿洵

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2025.01.001

机器人自主手术研究现状及展望

- 1.
  中国人民解放军总医院第三医学中心泌尿外科医学部(北京，100039)
- 2.
  香港中文大学深圳研究院
- 3.
  香港中文大学(深圳)理工学院
基金项目:
国家重点研发计划2023年“智能机器人”专项重点项目(No: 2023YFB4706000)

详细信息

作者简介:
张旭，中国科学院院士，解放军总医院泌尿外科医学部专业技术少将主任、主任医师、教授，博士研究生导师。我国泌尿外科腹腔镜和机器人技术的奠基人，担任中国医学科学院学部委员、中华医学会泌尿外科学分会候任主任委员、北京医学会理事会常务理事兼副会长、北京市医学会泌尿外科分会主任委员。全军科技领军人才，全军战创伤重点实验室主任，国家杰出青年基金获得者，国家高技术研究发展计划及全军重大后勤科研项目首席专家，2006年及2013年荣获2项国家科学技术进步二等奖。中央保健委员会专家组成员，享受国务院特殊津贴。Bladder、《微创泌尿外科杂志》等学术期刊主编

通讯作者: 张旭，E-mail：xzhang301@163.com

中图分类号: R699.1

收稿日期: 2024-10-26

刊出日期: 2025-01-06

Autonomous robotic surgery: research status and future prospect

- 1.
  Department of Urology, Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
- 2.
  Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
- 3.
  School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHANG Xu, E-mail: xzhang301@163.com

Received Date: 26 October 2024

Publish Date: 06 January 2025

摘要

摘要: 机器人自主手术是未来外科学发展的重要方向，指机器人能够在不依赖外科医生的情况下自主完成手术操作。然而，当前机器人手术仍然依赖主从式遥操作，自主手术能力尚未实现。机器人自主手术有望缓解全球医疗资源紧张和不均衡的问题，实现优质医疗资源的“一对多”和广覆盖，并对大众健康产生深远影响。本文旨在讨论手术机器人的自主性分级，概述当前技术研究现状以及在伦理、法律和社会学层面的挑战，并对其未来的发展方向进行展望。
- 机器人手术 /
- 自主手术 /
- 人工智能 /
- 微创外科
Abstract: Autonomous robotic surgery represents a significant direction in the future of surgical development, where robots are capable of independently performing surgical procedures without the involvement of surgeons. Currently, robotic surgery still relies on a master-slave system controlled by surgeons, and true autonomous functionality has yet to be realized. Autonomous robotic surgery has the potential for addressing global disparities in healthcare by providing scalable and widely accessible high-quality medical services, with profound impacts on public health and quality of life. This paper aims to discuss the level of autonomy in surgical robots, provide an overview of the current state of research in this field, and summarize the ethical, legal, and sociological challenges involved. Furthermore, it explores the future prospect of the development of autonomous robotic surgery.
- robotic surgery /
- autonomous surgery /
- artificial intelligence /
- minimally invasive surgery

HTML全文

参考文献(40)

[1]	Dagnino G, Kundrat D. Robot-assistive minimally invasive surgery: trends and future directions[J]. Int J Intell Robot Appl, 2024, 8: 812-826. doi: 10.1007/s41315-024-00341-2
[2]	Intuitive Surgical Web Page. Accessed: Oct. 20, 2024[Online]. Available: https://www.intuitive.com/en-us
[3]	Yang HY, Seon JK. The landscape of surgical robotics in orthopedics surgery[J]. Biomed Eng Lett, 2023, 13(4): 537-542. doi: 10.1007/s13534-023-00321-8
[4]	Kazemzadeh K, Akhlaghdoust M, Zali A. Advances in artificial intelligence, robotics, augmented and virtual reality in neurosurgery[J]. Front Surg, 2023, 10: 1241923. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1241923
[5]	Thirunavukarasu AJ, Hu ML, Foster WP, et al. Robot-assisted eye surgery: a systematic review of effectiveness, safety, and practicality in clinical settings[J]. Transl Vis Sci Technol, 2024, 13(6): 20. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.6.20
[6]	Chen PF, Wang YT, Tian DP, et al. The catheter and guidewire operating systems of vascular interventional surgical robots: a systematic review[J]. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics, 2023, 5(2): 180-195. doi: 10.1109/TMRB.2023.3272049
[7]	Rivero-Moreno Y, Echevarria S, Vidal-Valderrama C, et al. Robotic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature and current trends[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(7): e42370.
[8]	Catchpole K, Cohen T, Alfred M, et al. Human factors integration in robotic surgery[J]. Hum Factors, 2024, 66(3): 683-700. doi: 10.1177/00187208211068946
[9]	Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles(SAE International, 2021). Accessed: Oct. 20, 2024[Online]. Available: https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/.
[10]	Yang GZ, Cambias J, Cleary K, et al. Medical robotics-Regulatory, ethical, and legal considerations for increasing levels of autonomy[J]. Sci Robot, 2017, 2(4): eaam8638. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aam8638
[11]	Lee A, Baker TS, Bederson JB, et al. Levels of autonomy in FDA-cleared surgical robots: a systematic review[J]. NPJ Digit Med, 2024, 7(1): 103. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01102-y
[12]	Yu D, Nasir M, Pitts BJ, et al. L3 vehicles are becoming a reality: important human factors consideration for the viability of conditional automation[J]. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet, 2023, 67(1): 1285-1288. doi: 10.1177/21695067231192644
[13]	Klingberg L. The future of Remote Operations for Autonomous Vehicles: Exploring Human-Automation Teamwork and Situational Awareness for SAE Level 4 trucks. 2023.
[14]	Attanasio A, Scaglioni B, De Momi E, et al. Autonomy in surgical robotics[J]. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 2021, 4(1): 651-679. doi: 10.1146/annurev-control-062420-090543
[15]	Zorn KC, Elterman D, Gonzalez R, et al. Aquablation treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia: current standardized procedure[J]. J Endourol, 2022, 36(S2): S1-S5. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0439
[16]	Reddy K, Gharde P, Tayade H, et al. Advancements in robotic surgery: a comprehensive overview of current utilizations and upcoming frontiers[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(12): e50415.
[17]	Gu L, Yin C, Jia T, et al. Robotic surgery in China[J]. Innovation(Camb), 2023, 4(5): 100499.
[18]	Sirintuna D, Kastritsi T, Ozdamar I, et al. Enhancing human-robot collaborative transportation through obstacle-aware vibrotactile warning and virtual fixtures[J]. Robot Auton Syst, 2024, 178: 104725. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2024.104725
[19]	Bergholz M, Ferle M, Weber BM. The benefits of haptic feedback in robot assisted surgery and their moderators: a meta-analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 19215. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46641-8
[20]	Cheng M, Li RM, Ding RQ, et al. Dynamic guidance virtual fixture for hydraulic manipulator via learning from demonstration[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci, 2023, 237(4): 952-962. doi: 10.1177/09544062221124019
[21]	Ma RZ, Ramaswamy A, Xu JS, et al. Surgical gestures as a method to quantify surgical performance and predict patient outcomes[J]. NPJ Digit Med, 2022, 5(1): 187. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00738-y
[22]	van Amsterdam B, Clarkson MJ, Stoyanov D. Gesture recognition in robotic surgery: a review[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2021, 68(6): 2021-2035. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3054828
[23]	Leonard S, Wu KL, Kim Y, et al. Smart tissue anastomosis robot(STAR): a vision-guided robotics system for laparoscopic suturing[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2014, 61(4): 1305-1317. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2302385
[24]	Shademan A, Decker RS, Opfermann JD, et al. Supervised autonomous robotic soft tissue surgery[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2016, 8(337): 337ra64.
[25]	Schmidgall S, Krieger A, Eshraghian J. Surgical Gym: a high-performance GPU-based platform for reinforcement learning with surgical robots[C]//2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA). May 13-17, 2024, Yokohama, Japan. IEEE, 2024: 13354-13361.
[26]	Chan J, Auld TS, Long WJ, et al. Active robotic total knee arthroplasty(TKA): initial experience with the TSolution one^Ⓡ TKA system[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2020, 37: 299-305.
[27]	Zhang RY, Chen JH, Wang ZY, et al. A step towards conditional autonomy-robotic appendectomy[J]. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2023, 8(5): 2429-2436. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2023.3254859
[28]	Saeidi H, Opfermann JD, Kam M, et al. Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis[J]. Sci Robot, 2022, 7(62): eabj2908. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abj2908
[29]	Petoukhova A, Snijder R, Wiggenraad R, et al. Quality of automated stereotactic radiosurgery plans in patients with 4 to 10 brain metastases[J]. Cancers, 2021, 13(14): 3458. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143458
[30]	Marahrens N, Jones D, Murasovs N, et al. An ultrasound-guided system for autonomous marking of tumor boundaries during robot-assisted surgery[J]. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics, 2024, 6(4): 1699-1712. doi: 10.1109/TMRB.2024.3468397
[31]	Ge JW, Kam M, Opfermann JD, et al. Autonomous system for tumor resection(ASTR)-dual-arm robotic midline partial glossectomy[J]. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2024, 9(2): 1166-1173. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2023.3341773
[32]	Yanamala AKY, Suryadevara S, Kalli VDR. Balancing Innovation and Privacy: The Intersection of Data Protection and Artificial Intelligence[J]. International Journal of Machine Learning Research in Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 15(1): 1-43.
[33]	Saeidnia HR. Ethical artificial intelligence(AI): confronting bias and discrimination in the library and information industry[J]. Libr Hi Tech News, 2023, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
[34]	Bearman M, Ajjawi R. Learning to work with the black box: pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence[J]. Brit J Educational Tech, 2023, 54(5): 1160-1173. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13337
[35]	Lile DJ. FDA overview[M]. Translational Surgery. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. 2023: 501-507.
[36]	Fosch-Villaronga E, Khanna P, Drukarch H, et al. The role of humans in surgery automation[J]. Int J Soc Robot, 2023, 15(3): 563-580. doi: 10.1007/s12369-022-00875-0
[37]	Schmidgall S, Kim JW, Krieger A. Robots learning to imitate surgeons-challenges and possibilities[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2024, 21: 451-452. doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00873-z
[38]	Kim JW, Zhao T Z, Schmidgall S, et al. Surgical Robot Transformer(SRT): Imitation Learning for Surgical Subtasks[C]. 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning. Singapore, 2022.
[39]	Battaglia E, Boehm J, Zheng Y, et al. Rethinking autonomous surgery: focusing on enhancement over autonomy[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2021, 7(4): 696-705. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.06.009
[40]	Rivero-Moreno Y, Rodriguez M, Losada-Muñoz P, et al. Autonomous robotic surgery: has the future arrived?[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(1): e52243.