非感染性尿路结石患者尿液和结石细菌的菌谱及耐药性特征分析

何枝灿, 张世科, 唐一鸣, 等. 非感染性尿路结石患者尿液和结石细菌的菌谱及耐药性特征分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2025, 40(2): 115-119. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2025.02.004
引用本文: 何枝灿, 张世科, 唐一鸣, 等. 非感染性尿路结石患者尿液和结石细菌的菌谱及耐药性特征分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2025, 40(2): 115-119. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2025.02.004
HE Zhican, ZHANG Shike, TANG Yiming, et al. Analysis of bacteria spectrum and drug resistance of urine and stone bacteria in non-infection urinary tract stone patients[J]. J Clin Urol, 2025, 40(2): 115-119. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2025.02.004
Citation: HE Zhican, ZHANG Shike, TANG Yiming, et al. Analysis of bacteria spectrum and drug resistance of urine and stone bacteria in non-infection urinary tract stone patients[J]. J Clin Urol, 2025, 40(2): 115-119. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2025.02.004

非感染性尿路结石患者尿液和结石细菌的菌谱及耐药性特征分析

  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No:82270807,82070719);广州市科技基础与应用基础研究项目(No:2023A04J1866);本科生创新能力提升计划项目(No:02-408-2304-02118XM);广州医科大学大学生科技创新项目(No:02-410-2302007XM)
详细信息

Analysis of bacteria spectrum and drug resistance of urine and stone bacteria in non-infection urinary tract stone patients

More Information
  • 目的  探讨非感染性结石患者尿液和结石细菌培养的病原体分布及耐药性特征。 方法  收集2016年9月—2021年9月于广州医科大学附属第二医院行经皮肾镜取石术(percutaneous nephrolithotomy,PCNL)且完成中段尿与结石培养的非感染性结石患者临床资料,分析尿液与结石中致病菌分布与耐药性情况。 结果  共纳入符合标准的792例患者,尿液细菌培养(urine cultures,UC)阳性率为16.3%(129/792),尿液中共检出21种细菌,主要致病菌为大肠埃希菌(60.5%)、粪肠球菌(9.3%)及肺炎克雷伯菌(4.7%)。结石细菌培养(stone cultures,SC)阳性率为25.1%(199/792)。结石中共检出43种细菌,最常见细菌为大肠埃希菌(51.8%)、表皮葡萄球菌(6.0%)及粪肠球菌(3.0%)。进一步分析显示尿液与结石中常见细菌均呈多重耐药。其中尿液中大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯杆菌对多数头孢菌素、氨苄西林耐药率>40%,但对阿莫西林/克拉维酸、头孢哌酮舒巴坦、哌拉西林他唑巴坦敏感(耐药率均 < 10%);而粪肠球菌对红霉素、克林霉素、四环素耐药率>40%,但对氨苄西林、呋喃妥因、替加环素、利奈唑胺敏感(耐药率均为0)。尿液与结石中同一种类的细菌的耐药性未见明显差异。 结论  非感染性结石患者尿液与结石中的细菌菌谱复杂,且常见细菌均呈多重耐药,建议临床工作中常规行尿液及结石细菌培养,并根据药敏结果选择抗菌药物。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  非感染性结石患者UC及SC菌谱 例(%)

    菌谱 非感染性结石 草酸钙结石 尿酸结石 磷酸钙结石
    UC(129例) SC(199例) UC(91例) SC(149例) UC(34例) SC(44例) UC(4例) SC(6例)
    大肠埃希菌 78(60.5) 103(51.8) 58(63.7) 80(53.7) 18(52.9) 21(47.7) 2(50.0) 2(33.3)
    表皮葡萄球菌 2(1.6) 12(6.0) 1(1.1) 10(6.7) 1(2.9) 2(4.5) - -
    无乳链球菌 4(3.1) 1(0.5) 4(4.4) 1(0.7) - - - -
    粪肠球菌 12(9.3) 6(3.0) 8(8.8) 2(1.3) 4(11.8) 4(9.1) - -
    屎肠球菌 4(3.1) 5(2.5) 1(1.1) 2(1.3) 1(2.9) 2(4.5) 2(50.0) 1(16.7)
    奇异变形杆菌 2(1.6) 4(2.0) 2(2.2) 1(0.7) - 3(6.8) - -
    鲍曼不动杆菌 1(0.8) 3(1.5) - 3(2.0) 1(2.9) - - -
    铜绿假单胞菌 3(2.3) 5(2.5) 3(3.3) 4(2.7) - - - 1(16.7)
    肺炎克雷伯菌 6(4.7) 2(1.0) 5(5.5) 2(1.3) 1(2.9) - - -
    白色假丝酵母菌 2(1.6) 6(3.0) - 2(1.3) 2(5.9) 4(9.1) - -
    热带念珠菌 1(0.8) 3(1.5) 1(1.1) 2(1.3) - - - 1(16.7)
    光滑念珠菌 1(0.8) 2(1.0) - 2(1.3) 1(2.9) - - -
    近平滑念珠菌 - 2(1.0) - 2(1.3) - - - -
    其他a) 14(10.9) 45(22.6) 8(8.8) 36(24.2) 5(14.7) 8(18.2) - 1(16.7)
    注:a)其他包括毗邻颗粒链菌、嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌、弗劳地柠檬酸杆菌、洋葱伯克霍尔德菌等。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  非感染性结石患者UC及SC检出率前三细菌的耐药率 %

    抗菌药物 UC SC
    大肠埃希菌 粪肠球菌 肺炎克雷伯菌 大肠埃希菌 表皮葡萄球菌 粪肠球菌
    头孢唑啉 61.8(47/76) - 50.0(3/6) 52.4(54/103) - -
    头孢西丁 20.0(15/75) - 16.7(1/6) 11.1(11/99) - -
    头孢呋辛 60.8(31/51) - - 46.6(34/73) - -
    拉氧头孢 0(0/33) - - 2.4(1/42) - -
    头孢曲松 48.7(37/76) - 50.0(3/6) 43.1(44/102) - -
    头孢噻肟 50.0(38/76) - 50.0(3/6) 45.6(47/103) - -
    头孢他啶 26.0(20/77) - 16.7(1/6) 19.4(19/98) - -
    头孢哌酮/舒巴坦 8.0(6/75) - 0(0/5) 7.8(8/102) - -
    头孢吡肟 18.7(14/75) - 16.7(1/6) 21.4(22/103 - -
    青霉素 - 0(0/12) - - 100(11/11) 0(0/5)
    氨曲南 32.7(16/49) - 0(0/5) 32.8(24/73) -
    氨苄西林 85.4(41/48) 0(0/12) 100.0(5/5) 77.8(56/72) - 0(0/6)
    阿莫西林/克拉维酸 6.7(5/75) - 0(0/6) 5.9(6/101) -
    哌拉西林/他唑巴坦钠 2.6(2/76) - 0(0/6) 4.9(5/103) -
    庆大霉素 44.9(22/49) - 20.0(1/5) 32.4(24/74) 0(0/12)
    阿米卡星 5.3(4/75) - 0(0/6) 3.9(4/103) -
    妥布霉素 18.0(9/50) - 0(0/5) 10.6(8/75) -
    克林霉素 - 100.0(12/12) - - 33.3(4/12) 100.0(6/6)
    红霉素 - 58.3(7/12) - - 41.7(5/12) 66.7(4/6)
    左氧氟沙星 50.0(37/74) 9.1(1/11) 0(0/6) 41.0(41/100) 16.7(2/12) 33.3(2/6)
    环丙沙星 50.0(25/50) 20.0(2/10) 0(0/5) 45.3(34/75) - 40.0(2/5)
    莫西沙星 - 16.7(2/12) - - 9.1(1/11) 40.0(2/5)
    呋喃妥因 7.7(5/65) 0(0/10) 16.7(1/6) 6.7(6/90) - 0(0/5)
    复方新诺明 42.9(33/77) - 33.3(2/6) 53.4(55/103) 33.3(4/12)
    四环素 - 90.0(9/10) - - -
    替加环素 0(0/75) 0(0/11) 0(0/6) 0(0/102) 0(0/12) 0(0/6)
    奎奴普丁/达福普丁 - 100.0(10/10) - - -
    替考拉宁 - 0(0/12) - - 0(0/12) 0(0/6)
    亚胺培南 0(0/77) - 0(0/6) 1.9(2/103) -
    厄他培南 0(0/76) - 0(0/6) 1.9(2/103) -
    美罗培南 0(0/74) - 0(0/5) 0(0/61) -
    万古霉素 - 8.3(1/12) - - 0(0/12) 0(0/6)
    利奈唑胺 - 0(0/12) - - 0(0/12) 0(0/5)
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Skolarikos A, Jung H, Neisius A, et al. EAU Guideline on Urolithiasis 2024[EB/OL]. European Association of Urology web site. [2024-10-05]. https://uroweb.org/eau-guidelines.

    [2]

    郑军华, 李恭会, 秦卫军, 等. 泌尿系感染诊断治疗指南[M]//黄健, 张旭. 中国泌尿外科和男科疾病诊断治疗指南: 2022版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2022: 668-669.

    [3]

    Asadi Karam MR, Habibi M, Bouzari S. Urinary tract infection: Pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance and development of effective vaccines against Uropathogenic Escherichia coli[J]. Mol Immunol, 2019, 108: 56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.02.007

    [4]

    De Lorenzis E, Alba AB, Cepeda M, et al. Bacterial spectrum and antibiotic resistance of urinary tract infections in patients treated for upper urinary tract calculi: a multicenter analysis[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2020, 39(10): 1971-1981. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03947-z

    [5]

    林俊颜, 张穗仙, 欧旭东, 等. 感染性结石患者尿液细菌的菌谱及耐药性特征[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 43(10): 739-743. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20210323-00146

    [6]

    刘昊, 刘昌伟, 褚校涵, 等. 感染性结石的致病菌菌谱及预防结石复发的经验[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 43(10): 744-750. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20220805-00450

    [7]

    Zhang SK, Huang YP, Wu WZ, et al. Trends in urinary stone composition in 23, 182 stone analyses from 2011 to 2019: a high-volume center study in China[J]. World J Urol, 2021, 39(9): 3599-3605. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03680-y

    [8]

    Balasingam B, Varothayan S, Rajendra S, et al. Assessment of urinary stone chemical compositions and prevalence of metabolic disorders among urolithiasis patients in northern Sri Lanka: a prospective study[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(6): e63377.

    [9]

    An LY, Wu WZ, Li SJ, et al. Escherichia coli aggravates calcium oxalate stone formation via PPK1/flagellin-mediated renal oxidative injury and inflammation[J]. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2021, 2021: 9949697. doi: 10.1155/2021/9949697

    [10]

    Kanlaya R, Naruepantawart O, Thongboonkerd V. Flagellum is responsible for promoting effects of viable Escherichia coli on calcium oxalate crystallization, crystal growth, and crystal aggregation[J]. Front Microbiol, 2019, 10: 2507. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02507

    [11]

    Saelee K, Lulitanond A, Sae-Ung N, et al. Effects of Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis on the growth and aggregation of calcium oxalate crystal under microaerobic conditions[J]. Diagnostics(Basel), 2022, 12(11): 2651.

    [12]

    de Cógáin MR, Lieske JC, Vrtiska TJ, et al. Secondarily infected nonstruvite urolithiasis: a prospective evaluation[J]. Urology, 2014, 84(6): 1295-1300. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.007

    [13]

    Rivera M, Viers B, Cockerill P, et al. Pre-and postoperative predictors of infection-related complications in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. J Endourol, 2016, 30(9): 982-986. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0191

    [14]

    Nemoy NJ, Staney TA. Surgical, bacteriological, and biochemical management of "infection stones"[J]. JAMA, 1971, 215(9): 1470-1476. doi: 10.1001/jama.1971.03180220052010

    [15]

    Amimanan P, Tavichakorntrakool R, Fong-Ngern K, et al. Elongation factor Tu on Escherichia coli isolated from urine of kidney stone patients promotes calcium oxalate crystal growth and aggregation[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 2953. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03213-x

    [16]

    杨波, 昌能文, 胡浩, 等. 复杂上尿路结石患者尿和结石标本的细菌学研究[J]. 中国医药, 2016, 11(10): 1547-1551. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4777.2016.10.029

    [17]

    Zhong FL, Wu WZ, Chen D, et al. The characteristic and relationship of Escherichia coli isolated from urine and stones in patients with calcium oxalate stones[J]. Urolithiasis, 2021, 49(5): 407-414. doi: 10.1007/s00240-021-01243-9

    [18]

    Xu P, Zhang SK, Zhang YY, et al. Enhanced antibiotic treatment based on positive urine dipstick infection test before percutaneous nephrolithotomy did not prevent postoperative infection in patients with negative urine culture[J]. J Endourol, 2021, 35(12): 1743-1749. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0185

    [19]

    Zhang SK, Li GH, Qiao LD, et al. The antibiotic strategies during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in China revealed the gap between the reality and the urological guidelines[J]. BMC Urol, 2022, 22(1): 136. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01092-7

    [20]

    Ranjan Dash N, Albataineh MT, Alhourani N, et al. Community-acquired urinary tract infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing organisms in United Arab Emirates[J]. Travel Med Infect Dis, 2018, 22: 46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2018.01.007

    [21]

    Vachvanichsanong P, McNeil EB, Dissaneewate P. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae urinary tract infections[J]. Epidemiol Infect, 2020, 149: e12.

    [22]

    Husna A, Rahman MM, Badruzzaman AM, et al. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases(ESBL): challenges and opportunities[J]. Biomedicines, 2023, 11(11): 2937. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11112937

    [23]

    Chong Y, Shimoda S, Shimono N. Current epidemiology, genetic evolution and clinical impact of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae[J]. Infect Genet Evol, 2018, 61: 185-188. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.04.005

    [24]

    韩明明, 袁月. 产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌在尿路感染中的相关分析[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2024, 44(2): 260-264. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn431460-20220822-00062

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  57
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-11-05
刊出日期:  2025-02-06

返回顶部

目录