双频双脉冲激光碎石术与钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的比较

许嘉骏; 周伟民; 谭剑敏; 张涛亮; 高赟; 傅鑫华; 徐丹枫

双频双脉冲激光碎石术与钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的比较

- 1. 上海市长征医院闸北分院泌尿外科(上海, 200070);
- 2. 第二军医大学附属长征医院泌尿外科

详细信息

通讯作者: 许嘉骏,E-mail:jiajunxu@sogou.com

中图分类号: R693

收稿日期: 2012-02-22

Comparison of the frequency-doubled double-pulse neodynium: YAG and holmium: YAG lasers lithotripsy for treatment of ureteral stones

- 1. Department of Urology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital Zhabei Branch, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200070, China;
- 2. Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University

More Information

Corresponding author: XU Jiajun, E-mail: jiajunxu@sogou.com

Received Date: 22 February 2012

摘要

摘要: 目的：评价双频双脉冲激光与钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的临床疗效。方法：应用输尿管镜技术治疗870例输尿管结石患者，双频激光碎石术治疗312例（输尿管上段结石52例，中下段输尿管结石260例）；以钬激光碎石术治疗558例（输尿管上段结石92例，中下段输尿管结石466例），进行疗效比较。结果：双频激光和钬激光结石总体清除率分别为92.6%（289/312）和98.4%（549/558）（P>0.05）；中、下段输尿管结石上移率分别为4.2%（11/260）和1.9%（9/466）；手术平均碎石时间，双频激光组为（39.8±5.4）min，钬激光组为（26.5±7.2）min（P<0.01）；平均结石排净时间为（29.2±6.8） d和（18.5±4.4） d（P<0.01）；钬激光组发生输尿管穿孔5例，双频激光组无穿孔发生。结论：双频激光碎石术及钬激光碎石术均为有效的碎石方法；在平均碎石时间、结石排净时间方面钬激光碎石术具有优势；双频激光碎石术在安全性方面具有优势。
- 输尿管结石 /
- 输尿管镜 /
- 碎石术 /
- 激光
Abstract: Objective: To compare clinical effective and complication rates of frequency-doubled double-pulse(FREDDY)and holmium laser lithotripsy for treatment of ureteral stones.Method: Eight hundred and seventy patients underwent ureteroscope lithotripsy either with FREDDY laser lithotripter(52 cases of proximal ureter calculi and 260 cases of middle distal ureter calculi among 312cases)or with holmium laser lithotripter(92 cases of proximal ureter calculi and 466 cases of middle distal ureter among 558cases)for the treatment of ureteral stones.Result: The rate of stone-free cases was 92.6%(289/312)and 98.4%(549/558)(P>0.05);The rate of stone retropulsion to renal pelvis 4.2%(11/260)in FREDDY laser group and 1.9%(9/466)holmium laser group.The average lithotripsy time of FREDDY laser and holmium laser were(39.8±5.4)min and(26.5±7.2)min(P<0.01).The average stone-free time of FREDDY laser and holmium laser were(29.2±6.8)days and(18.5±4.4)days(P<0.01).5 perforations were encountered in holmium laser group whereas no perforation in FREDDY laser group.Conclusion: Endoscopic FREDDY laser and holmium laser lithotripsy are all effective treatment modality for ureteral stones.Holmium laser lithotripsy has its advantage over FREDDY laser lithotripsy in the average lithotripsy time and the average stone-free time,Whereas,FREDDY laser lithotripsy has its advantage in the safety.
- ureteral stone /
- lithotripsy /
- ureteroscope /
- laser

HTML全文

参考文献(11)

[1]	方克伟,李泽惠,徐鸿毅,等.经尿道输尿管镜技术在泌尿外科的应用(附1100例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(3):192-195.
[2]	DELVECCHIO F C,AUGE B K,BRIZUELA R M,et al.In vitro analysis of stone fragmentation ability of the FREDDY laser[J].J Endourol,2003,17:177-179.
[3]	EBERT A,STANGL J,KVHN R,et al.The frequency-doublted double-pulse Neodym:YAG laser lithotripter(FREDDY)in lithotripsy of urinary stones.First clinical experience[J]. Urologe A,2003,42:825-833.
[4]	ZORCHER T,HOCHBERGER J,SCHROTT K M,et al.In vitro study concerning the efficiency of the Frequency-Doubled Double-Pulse Neodymium:YAG Laser(FREDDY)for lithotripsy of calculi in the urinary tract[J].Lasers Surg Med,1999,25:38-42.
[5]	黄旭元,薄隽杰,陈斌,等.双频双脉冲激光碎石治疗输尿管结石的效果[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2003,24(10):666-668.
[6]	Erhard M J,Bagley D H.Urologic applications of the holmium laser:preliminary experience[J]. J Endourol,1995,9:383-386.
[7]	吴忠,丁强,姜昊文,等.输尿管肾镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(1):27-29.
[8]	李新德,许力为,丁国庆,等.腔内钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石影响因素研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(1):24-26.
[9]	孙颖浩,高小峰.钬激光在泌尿外科中的应用[J].医学研究杂志,2010,39(8):2-5.
[10]	Marks A J, Teichman J M. Lasers in clinical urology:state of the art and new horizons[J]. World J Urol, 2007, 25:227-233.
[11]	MARGUET C G,SUNG J C,SPRINGHART W P,et al.In vitro comparison of stone retropulsion and fragmentation of the frequency doubled double pulse Nd:YAG laser and the holmium:YAG laser[J].J Urol,2005,173:1797-1800.