Efficacy and safety of everolimus in the second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a single center report of seven cases
-
摘要: 目的:评价依维莫司二线治疗转移性肾细胞癌的疗效和安全性。方法:2010年6月~2010年12月,7例转移性肾细胞癌患者接受依维莫司治疗,男4例,女3例,年龄40~74岁,平均56.5岁。5例不能耐受血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)靶向治疗,2例为VEGF靶向治疗过程中病情进展。既往接受索拉非尼治疗3例,帕唑帕尼治疗4例。7例患者均接受口服依维莫司 10 mg 每日1次的治疗。结果:随访时间截至目前42~48个月,中位时间45.5个月。根据RECIST标准,最佳疗效评价显示疾病稳定(SD)6例(85.71%),疾病进展(PD)1例(14.29%),无完全缓解(CR)及部分缓解(PR)病例。疾病控制率(DCR)为85.71%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为6.0个月(95%CI:4.4~7.6个月)。不良反应多为1~2级;3级不良反应包括非感染性肺炎1例、贫血1例、血糖升高1例、GGT升高1例;4级不良反应为重度贫血1例。通过对症治疗及药物剂量调整,不良反应大多可以控制并耐受。结论:依维莫司二线治疗转移性肾细胞癌具有较好的疾病控制率,大多数患者可以从治疗中获益,药物不良反应可控。Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus in the second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).Method:From Jun. 2010 to Dec. 2010, seven patients with mRCC were treated with everolimus, including four males and three females. The average age was 56.5 (range, 40-74) years old. Five of them were intolerant to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy, and two of them progressed during VEGF targeted therapy. Three patients had previously received sorafenib targeted therapy, and four patients had previously received pazopanib targeted therapy. All seven patients were given everolimus 10 mg daily.Result:Follow-up period was 42-48 months, and median follow-up period was 45.5 months. According to RECIST, six patients (85.71%) achieved stable disease (SD), one patient (14.29%) demonstrated progression disease (PD), and no patient achieved complete response (CR) or partial response(PR). Disease control rate (DCR) was 85.71%. Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95%CI:4.4-7.6 months). The most common adverse events were grade 1-2. Grade 3 adverse events included non-infectious pneumonia (one patient), anaemia (one patient), hyperglycaemia (one patient), and elevated GGT (one patient). Grade 4 adverse event was serious anaemia (one patient). Most adverse events were ameliorated by giving the dose adjustment and symptomatic treatment.Conclusion:Everolimus has a better disease control rate in the second-line treatment of patients with mRCC. Most of patients can benefit from the treatment, and drug-related adverse events could be effectively controlled.
-
Key words:
- renal cell carcinoma /
- neoplasm metastasis /
- everolimus
-
-
[1] Cohen H T, McGovern F J. Renal-cell carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353(23):2477-2490.
[2] Sandock D S, Seftel A D, Resnick M I. A new protocol for the followup of renal cell carcinoma based on pathological stage[J]. J Urol, 1995, 154(1):28-31.
[3] McDermott D F, Regan M M, Clark J I, et al. Randomized phase III trial of high-dose interleukin-2 versus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(1):133-141.
[4] Thomas G V, Tran C, Mellinghoff I K, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor determines sensitivity to inhibitors of mTOR in kidney cancer[J]. Nat Med, 2006, 12(1):122-127.
[5] Brugarolas J B, Vazquez F, Reddy A, et al. TSC2 regulates VEGF through mTOR-dependent and -independent pathways[J]. Cancer Cell, 2003, 4(2):147-158.
[6] Motzer R, Escudier B, Oudard S, et al. Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma:a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial[J]. Lancet, 2008, 372(9637):449-456.
[7] Grünwald V, Karakiewicz P I, Bavbek S E, et al. An international expanded-access programme of everolimus:Addressing safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who progress after initial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2012, 48(3):324-332.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 210
- PDF下载数: 168
- 施引文献: 0