输尿管下段结石钬激光碎石开展日间手术的优势与体会

刘鹏, 姚雪, 王康, 等. 输尿管下段结石钬激光碎石开展日间手术的优势与体会[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 37(4): 312-314. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2022.04.014
引用本文: 刘鹏, 姚雪, 王康, 等. 输尿管下段结石钬激光碎石开展日间手术的优势与体会[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 37(4): 312-314. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2022.04.014
LIU Peng, YAO Xue, WANG Kang, et al. Advantages and experience of holmium laser lithotripsy in lower ureteral calculi as day operation[J]. J Clin Urol, 2022, 37(4): 312-314. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2022.04.014
Citation: LIU Peng, YAO Xue, WANG Kang, et al. Advantages and experience of holmium laser lithotripsy in lower ureteral calculi as day operation[J]. J Clin Urol, 2022, 37(4): 312-314. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2022.04.014

输尿管下段结石钬激光碎石开展日间手术的优势与体会

详细信息
    通讯作者: 尚吉文,E-mail:Sjw139@126.com
  • 中图分类号: R693

Advantages and experience of holmium laser lithotripsy in lower ureteral calculi as day operation

More Information
  • 总结输尿管下段结石钬激光碎石作为日间手术的优势与体会。选取2019年11月—2020年10月行钬激光碎石+支架管置入术治疗输尿管下段结石患者50例,将患者随机纳入日间手术组与常规手术组,日间手术组利用日间手术运行模式实施输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术,常规手术组利用传统住院模式实施输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术,比较2组术前等待时间、住院时间、结石清除率、术后并发症和住院费用等指标。日间手术组术前等待时间明显少于常规手术组[(27±6) h vs.(72±11) h,P< 0.05]。日间手术组住院时间明显少于常规手术组[(38±9) h vs.(96±25) h,P< 0.05]。日间手术组住院费用明显低于常规手术组[(10 443±1302)元vs.(16 523±2347)元,P< 0.05]。2组结石清除率(91.4% vs. 91.8%,P>0.05)和术后并发症发生率(4.3% vs. 0,P>0.05)比较差异无统计学意义,在手术安全性及治疗效果方面无差异,皆安全可行。输尿管下段结石钬激光碎石开展日间手术安全可行,具有住院时间短、医疗费用低、治疗效果确切等优点,是一种高效安全的治疗模式,值得积极推广。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  2组患者相关指标比较 X±S

    指标 日间手术组
    (n=23)
    常规手术组
    (n=27)
    手术等待时间/h 27±6 72±11
    住院时间/h 38±9 96±25
    结石清除率/% 91.4 91.8
    住院费用/元 10 443±1302 16 523±2347
    并发症发生率/% 4.3 0
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Roberts L. Day surgery-National and international: From the past to the future[J]. Ambulatory Surgery, 2006, 12(3): 143-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ambsur.2005.02.002

    [2]

    Suhonen RA, Iivonen MK, Vlimki MA. Day-casesurgery patients health-related quality of life[J]. Int J Nurs Pract, 2007, 13(2): 121-129. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2007.00610.x

    [3]

    曾国华, 麦赞林, 夏术阶, 等. 中国成年人群尿石症患病率横断面调查[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 36(7): 528-532. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2015.07.014

    [4]

    Resorlu B, Unsal A, Ziypak T, et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones[J]. World J Urol, 2013, 31(6): 1581-1586. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0991-1

    [5]

    Boudreaux AM, Simmons JW. Prehabilitation and Optimization of Modifiable Patient Risk Factors: The Importance of Effective Preoperative Evaluation to Improve Surgical Outcomes[J]. AORN J, 2019, 109(4): 500-507. doi: 10.1002/aorn.12646

    [6]

    Hall MJ, Schwartzman A, Zhang J, et al. Ambulatory Surgery Data From Hospitals and Ambulatory Surgery Centers: United States, 2010[J]. Natl Health Stat Report, 2017, (102): 1-15.

    [7]

    白雪, 马洪升, 罗利. 中外日间手术发展对比研究及展望[J]. 中国医院管理, 2014, 34(5): 35-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYGL201405018.htm

    [8]

    Zhong W, Leto G, Wang L, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after nexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a study of risk factors[J]. J Endourol, 2015, 29(1): 25-28. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0409

    [9]

    范永保, 沈文, 吴义高, 等. 输尿管结石微创术后感染性发热危险因素分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 36(11): 897-899. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMW202111013.htm

    [10]

    Sui W, Theofanides MC, Matulay JT, et al. Utilization of Preoperative Laboratory Testing for Low-risk, Ambulatory Urologic Procedures[J]. Urology, 2016, 94: 77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.053

    [11]

    冀冰心, 李小莹, 张艳红, 等. 日间病房病种准入与病案模板化管理[J]. 中国病案, 2016, 17(11): 16-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGBN201611006.htm

    [12]

    Zylstra J, Boshier P, Whyte GP, et al. Peri-operative patient optimization for oesophageal cancer surgery-From prehabilitation to enhanced recovery[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2018, 36-37: 61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.11.006

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1728
  • PDF下载数:  881
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-03-15
刊出日期:  2022-04-06

目录