-
摘要: 目的 研究环形缝合(Ring suture)肾门重建术在肾门部肿瘤患者中应用的安全性与有效性。方法 回顾性分析2016年1月—2021年12月复旦大学附属中山医院行保留肾单位手术环形缝合重建患者的临床资料,统计患者的一般情况、手术方式、术后并发症、随访数据。结果 共收集患者43例,其中男33例,女10例。患者平均肿瘤直径(2.9±1.1) cm,平均中山评分(8.2±0.8)分,平均R.E.N.A.L.评分(8.4±0.8)分,2例患者因肾门血管损伤改为根治性肾切除。环形缝合重建方法为将切除肿瘤后的肾门创面前后缘对合缝合,根据创面大小分两层或单层缝合。患者平均手术时间(91.0±19.1) min;平均热缺血时间(24.1±4.6) min;术后平均住院时间(5.2±1.5) d。发生相关并发症15例,其中ClavienⅠ级14例,Ⅱ级1例。35例患者获得随访,平均随访时间(32.5±19.0)个月;均未发现肿瘤转移复发。讨论 肾门部肿瘤保留肾单位手术环形缝合重建是肾实质重建的一种手术改良,不会导致术后并发症的增加,并能有效地保留肾脏功能。Abstract: Objective To study the safety and efficacy of ring suture hilar reconstruction in patients with hilar tumors.Methods Clinical data of selected patients who underwent nephron sparing surgery (NSS) and ring suture reconstruction from January 2016 to December 2021 at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University were retrospectively analysed, and the general conditions, surgical procedures, postoperative complications, and follow-up data of patients were counted.Results A total of 43 patients' information was collected, including 33 males and 10 females. The mean tumor diameter of the patients was (2.9±1.1) cm, the mean Zhongshan score was (8.2±0.8), and the mean R.E.N.A.L. score was (8.4±0.8). Two patients were converted to radical nephrectomy due to hilar vascular injury. Ring suture reconstruction was performed by suturing the anterior and posterior edges of the hilar wound after resection of the tumor in two layers or in a single layer, depending on the size of the wound. The mean operative time of the patients was (91.0±19.1) min; the mean warm ischemia time was (24.1±4.6) min; and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (5.2±1.5) days. Fifteen cases of related complications occurred, including 14 cases of Clavien grade Ⅰ and 1 case of grade Ⅱ. Thirty-five patients were followed up with a mean follow-up time of (32.5±19.0) months on the average, and no tumor metastasis recurrence was detected in any of them.Conclusion Ring suture reconstruction is a surgical modification of NSS that does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications and is effective in preserving renal function.
-
Key words:
- kidney neoplasms /
- partial nephrectomy /
- renal hilus
-
[1] Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update[J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 67(5): 913-924. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005
[2] Dong W, Wu J, Suk-Ouichai C, et al. Ischemia and Functional Recovery from Partial Nephrectomy: Refined Perspectives[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2018, 4(4): 572-578. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.001
[3] 张崔建, 曹剑哲, 李学松, 等. 切缘环形缝合技术在肾部分切除术中的应用效果[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2015, 53(11): 852-855. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2015.11.012
[4] Bahler CD, Dube HT, Flynn KJ, et al. Feasibility of omitting cortical renorrhaphy during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a matched analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2015, 29(5): 548-555. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0763
[5] 王刚刚, 王正, 夏庆华, 等. 提前贯穿缝合的腹腔镜肾部分切除术的安全性和有效性分析(附7例报告)[J/OL]. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 8(2): 32-35, 46.
[6] 李功成, 潘铁军, 文瀚东, 等. 后腹腔镜肾部分切除术三种不同缝合方式有效性及安全性的比较研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 31(1): 41-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMW201601014.htm
[7] 刘启明, 高宇, 马鑫, 等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术创面缝合技巧和效果分析(附76例报告)[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 7(3): 154-158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WCMN201803005.htm
[8] 王正, 王杰, 鲍一, 等. 微创技术下肾部分切除术治疗完全内生型肾脏肿瘤的手术要点和临床疗效分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 36(7): 555-559, 566. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMW202107010.htm
[9] 宋尚卿, 顾欣, 于国鹏, 等. 单孔腹腔镜肾癌保肾手术68例经验总结[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 37(1): 11-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMW202201003.htm
[10] Campbell SC, Lane BR, Pierorazio PM. Malignant Renal Tumors[M]//Alan W. Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology. 12th ed. Canada: Elsevier, 2020: 9912-10143.
[11] Zhang C, Li X, Yu W, et al. Ring Suture Technique in Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar Cancer: A New Renorrhaphy Technique[J]. J Endourol, 2016, 30(4): 390-394. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0691
[12] 龙嘉辉, 刘霄强, 陈路遥, 等. 肾部分切除术肾组织重建缝合方式的研究进展[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 10(5): 353-359. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WCMN202105015.htm