Selection of the operation timing for hydronephrosis caused by UPJO using the anteroposterior diameter of the renal pelvis as a reference
-
摘要: 目的探讨肾盂前后径(APD)在1.5~2.0 cm的小儿先天性肾积水手术时机的选择。方法回顾性分析新疆医科大学第一附属医院2018年1月—2020年1月收治的60例因单侧UPJO导致的先天性肾积水患儿的临床资料。将其分为两组:A组(30例),APD达到1.5~2.0 cm时立即行手术治疗;B组(30例),APD达到1.5~2.0 cm时给予详细解释后根据家属意愿继续随访观察,其中26例随访过程中病情进一步发展(APD>2.0 cm)行手术治疗,4例出现临床症状后(腹痛、泌尿道感染)行手术治疗。60例患儿均行腹腔镜下或开放性小切口离断性肾盂输尿管成形术,采用彩色多普勒泌尿系超声和肾动脉显像(SPECT)分析两组术后24个月肾脏形态(APD、肾实质厚度)和肾功能(分肾功能)恢复情况。结果与术前比较,术后24个月A、B组APD均显著缩小[A组:(17.12±2.52) mm vs. (10.06±1.25) mm;B组:(23.59±3.09) mm vs.(13.26±1.68) mm],肾实质厚度显著增加[A组:(5.79±0.61) mm vs.(9.66±0.65)mm;B组:(3.82±0.91) mm vs.(5.93±0.61) mm],分肾功能显著改善[A组:(45.55±1.13)% vs.(57.65±0.65)%;B组:(26.65±0.53)% vs.(38.89±0.68)%],且术后24个月A组APD、肾实质厚度及分肾功能恢复程度均优于B组(均P < 0.05)。结论对于通过泌尿系B超测得APD在1.5~2.0 cm的先天性肾积水患儿应早期行手术治疗,避免肾脏形态和肾功能不可逆性损伤,提高患儿的生活质量。Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the selection of surgical timing for children with congenital hydronephrosis whose anterior posterior diameter of renal pelvis(APD) is in the range of 1.5-2.0 cm.MethodsThe clinical data of 60 children with congenital hydronephrosis caused by unilateral UPJO who were admitted in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups: group A (n=30), surgery was performed immediately when the APD reached 1.5-2.0 cm; Group B (n=30), after the APD reached 1.5-2.0 cm, detailed explanations were given, and follow-up observation was continued according to the wishes of the family members. Twenty-six patients in group B developed further(APD>2.0 cm) during follow-up and received surgical treatment. Other four patients had clinical symptoms(abdominal pain, urinary tract infection) and received surgical treatment. All 60 patients underwent laparoscopic or open small incision dismembered ureteropelvioplasty. Color Doppler ultrasonography and renal artery imaging were used to analyze the recovery of renal morphology(APD, renal parenchyma thickness) and renal function(sub-renal function) 24 months after operation in the two groups.ResultsCompared with those before operation, APD in the Group A and B decreased significantly 24 months after operation[Group A: (17.12±2.52) mm vs. (10.06±1.25) mm; Group B: (23.59±3.09) mm vs. (13.26±1.68) mm], renal parenchyma thickness increased significantly[Group A: (5.79±0.61) mm vs. (9.66±0.65)mm; Group B: (3.82±0.91) mm vs. (5.93±0.61) mm], and sub-renal function was significantly improved[Group A: (45.55±1.13)% vs. (57.65±0.65)%; Group B: (26.65±0.53)% vs. (38.89±0.68)%], and the recovery of APD, renal parenchyma thickness and sub-renal function in Group A were better than those in Group B 24 months after operation(all P < 0.05).ConclusionEarly surgical treatment should be performed for children with congenital hydronephrosis with APD in the range of 1.5-2.0 cm measured by urinary B-ultrasound to avoid irreversible damage to renal morphology and function, and to improve the quality of life of children.
-
-
表 1 A、B组手术前后APD、肾实质厚度和分肾功能比较
X±S 时间 A组(30例) B组(30例) APD/mm 肾实质厚度/mm 分肾功能/% APD/mm 肾实质厚度/mm 分肾功能/% 术前 17.12±2.52 5.79±0.61 45.55±1.13 23.59±3.09 3.82±0.91 26.65±0.53 术后3个月 15.04±1.56 7.01±0.58 50.83±0.56 19.23±2.06 4.34±0.35 31.21±0.75 术后6个月 13.98±1.88 7.87±0.88 53.35±0.64 17.36±1.97 4.94±0.65 34.98±0.81 术后12个月 12.05±1.84 8.97±0.69 55.90±0.84 15.56±1.26 5.48±0.43 36.56±0.63 术后18个月 11.81±0.95 9.05±0.26 56.12±0.67 14.78±1.04 5.74±0.25 37.27±0.45 术后24个月 10.06±1.251) 9.66±0.651) 57.65±0.651) 13.26±1.681)2) 5.93±0.611)2) 38.89±0.681)2) 与术前比较,1)P < 0.05;与A组术后24个月比较,2)P < 0.05。 -
[1] 高晓峰, 伏雯, 贾炜, 等. 微创小切口治疗婴幼儿肾积水后再手术的回顾性分析[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2021, 42(3): 232-235. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20191222-00696
[2] 吴勇, 关勇, 王欣, 等. 腹腔镜手术治疗儿童急性症状型肾积水临床价值探讨[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 36(10): 761-765, 768. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2021.10.001
[3] Masieri L, Sforza S, Cini C, et al. Minilaparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children less Than 1 Year[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(7): 970-975. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0586
[4] 周云, 柴红超, 王静茹. 硅胶外支架外引流与双J管内引流在肾积水手术中的应用比较[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 36(4): 301-304. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2021.04.012
[5] Storm DW, Braga LH, Cooper CS. Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric urology[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2018, 45(4): 525-538. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.06.001
[6] 鲁冰, 任东升, 栗明. 左卡尼汀联合血液透析对尿毒症患者Treg/Th17细胞、血清炎症因子和肾功能指标的影响[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志, 2019, 11(2): 117-121, 127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYQ201902010.htm
[7] 中华医学会小儿外科分会泌尿外科学组. 先天性肾盂输尿管交界处梗阻诊疗专家共识[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2018, 39(11): 804-810. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2018.11.002
[8] Perlman S, Roitman L, Lotan D, et al. Severe fetal hydronephrosis: the added value of associated congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract(CAKUT)in the prediction of postnatal outcome[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2018, 38(3): 179-183. doi: 10.1002/pd.5206
[9] 何雨竹, 倪鑫, 张潍平. 儿童先天性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻性肾积水手术治疗策略研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 501-504. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2021.06.001
[10] Chiodini B, Ghassemi M, Khelif K, et al. Clinical outcome of children with antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis[J]. Front Pediatr, 2019, 7: 103. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00103
[11] Longpre M, Nguan A, Macneily AE, et al. Prediction of the outcome of antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: a multivariable analysis[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2012, 8(2): 135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.05.013
[12] Babu R, Rathish VR, Sai V. Functional outcomes of early versus delayed pyeloplasty in prenatally diagnosed pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2015, 11(2): 63.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.007
[13] 肖兴望, 何大维. 儿童肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻肾积水超声图像与非手术治疗预后相关性研究进展[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂, 2019, 34(11): 873-876.
[14] Kachakova D, Mitkova A, Popov E, et al. Evaluation of the clinical value of the newly identified urine biomarker HIST1H4K for diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer in Bulgarian patients[J]. J BUON, 2013, 18(3): 660-668.
[15] 林松, 周辉霞, 陈海涛. 产前检出肾积水手术时机与指征的探讨[J]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2016, 4(2): 68-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FYYD201602003.htm
[16] 肖兴望, 何大维, 刘星, 等. 儿童单侧肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻随访结局的预测因素与观察期限分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 40(3): 215-219. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10631-1019659431.htm
[17] Sarhan OM, El Helaly A, Al Otay AH, et al. Prenatally detected, unilateral, high-grade hydronephrosis: Can we predict the natural history?[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2018, 12(3): 137-141.
[18] Cho HY, Jung I, Kim YH, et al. Reliability of society of fetal urology and Onen grading system in fetal hydronephrosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2019, 62(2): 87-92.
[19] Zhang D, Sun X, Chen X, et al. Ultrasound evaluation for prediction of outcomes and surgical decision in fetal hydronephrosis[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 18(2): 1399-1406.
[20] 刘瑶, 吴青青. 产前超声定量指标预测胎儿肾盂增宽预后的价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2022, 24(7): 517-520. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCCY202207008.htm
[21] Abdrabuh AM, Salih EM, Aboelnasr M, et al. Endopyelotomy versus redo pyeoloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty in children: A single center experience[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2018, 53(11): 2250-2255.
[22] 王展, 唐达星, 田红娟, 等. 肾盂前后径对肾积水胎儿出生后是否手术的预测价值[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(5): 493-498. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYB201905008.htm
[23] Kiener TA, Wohlmuth C, Schimke C, et al. Ultrasound markers in fetal hydronephrosis to predict postnatal surgery[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2020, 41(3): 278-285.
[24] 彭柳成, 赵夭望, 李创业, 等. 肾盂前后径对胎儿肾积水出生后行肾盂成形术的预测价值分析[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2020, 19(3): 218-223. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXR202003008.htm
-