体外冲击波碎石术:40年的经验和教训

田原, 郑晓鹏, 黄儒, 等. 体外冲击波碎石术:40年的经验和教训[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 39(4): 281-285. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2024.04.004
引用本文: 田原, 郑晓鹏, 黄儒, 等. 体外冲击波碎石术:40年的经验和教训[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 39(4): 281-285. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2024.04.004
TIAN Yuan, ZHENG Xiaopeng, HUANG Ru, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: four decades with lessons learnt[J]. J Clin Urol, 2024, 39(4): 281-285. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2024.04.004
Citation: TIAN Yuan, ZHENG Xiaopeng, HUANG Ru, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: four decades with lessons learnt[J]. J Clin Urol, 2024, 39(4): 281-285. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2024.04.004
(编者按

原文:Four decades with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Lessons learnt

Hans-Göran Tiselius (Department of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Sweden)

Christian G Chaussy (University of Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany)

)

体外冲击波碎石术:40年的经验和教训

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R691.4

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: four decades with lessons learnt

  • 1980年,体外冲击波碎石术(extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,SWL)的出现无疑给尿石症患者的治疗带来了革命性的变化,到目前为止已经治疗了数百万名结石患者。然而,SWL的治疗结果受到操作水平的影响,技术的准确使用和细节的注意对于获得满意的治疗效果至关重要,特别是对于输尿管结石。SWL不仅创伤小、经济,而且可以在没有全身或局部麻醉的情况下完成,它还可以在没有手术室的门诊环境下进行。此外,这种不需要麻醉的结石治疗方法,在COVID-19时期使医务工作者避免了与冠状病毒的气溶胶接触。另外一些不需要麻醉的微创辅助治疗可以处理一些SWL治疗不成功的患者。在这篇综述中,我们总结了在过去40年中使用SWL而遇到的各种的临床问题,在现有的知识体系下,提供实用且可操作的信息,为临床工作者在平衡SWL治疗效果与患者安全方面提供有力的参考和依据。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmiedt E. Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves[J]. Lancet, 1980, 2(8207): 1265-1268.

    [2]

    Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, et al. First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves[J]. J Urol, 1982, 127(3): 417-420. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)53841-0

    [3]

    Chaussy C, Eisenberger F, Forssmann B. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy(ESWL): a chronology[J]. J Endourol, 2007, 21(11): 1249-1253. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.9880

    [4]

    Chaussy CG, Tiselius HG. What you should know about extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and how you can improve your performance[M]//Talati J, Tiselius HG, Albala D, et al. Urolithiasis. London: Springer, 2012: 383-393.

    [5]

    Chaussy CG, Tiselius HG. How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?[J]. Urolithiasis, 2018, 46(1): 3-17. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1020-z

    [6]

    Tiselius HG, Chaussy CG. Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones[J]. Urolithiasis, 2015, 43(5): 387-396. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0818-9

    [7]

    Tiselius HG, Chaussy CG. Examples of clinical problems that might be encountered in patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[M]//Talati J, Tiselius HG, Albala D, et al. Urolithiasis. London: Springer, 2012: 395-400.

    [8]

    Tiselius HG. Shockwave treatment of renal calculi(Chapter 51)[M]// Smith AD, Badlani GH, Preminger GM, et al. Smith's Textbook of Endourology. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2012: 576-597.

    [9]

    Tiselius H. Chemolytic treatment of patients with urinary tract stones[M]// Rao NP, Preminger GM, Kavanagh JP. Urinary Tract Stone Disease. London: Springer, 2011: 627-637.

    [10]

    Tiselius HG. Anesthesia-free in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones[J]. J Urol, 1991, 146(1): 8-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37701-7

    [11]

    Tiselius HG. How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?[J]. J Endourol, 2008, 22(2): 249-255. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0225

    [12]

    Tiselius HG. Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?[J]. Urol Res, 2005, 33(3): 185-190. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0462-x

    [13]

    Tailly GG, Tailly-Cusse MM. Optical coupling control: an important step toward better shockwave lithotripsy[J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28(11): 1368-1373. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0338

    [14]

    Leykamm L, Tiselius HG. Observations on intrarenal geometry of the lower-caliceal system in relation to clearance of stone fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy[J]. J Endourol, 2007, 21(4): 386-392. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0292

    [15]

    Ringdén I, Tiselius HG. Composition and clinically determined hardness of urinary tract stones[J]. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2007, 41(4): 316-323. doi: 10.1080/00365590601154551

    [16]

    Tiselius HG, Ringdén I. Stone treatment index: a mathematical summary of the procedure for removal of stones from the urinary tract[J]. J Endourol, 2007, 21(11): 1261-1269. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0048

    [17]

    Long QL, Zhang J, Xu ZB, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of external physical vibration lithecbole after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a lower pole renal stone less than 2 cm[J]. J Urol, 2016, 195(4 Pt 1): 965-970.

    [18]

    Chaussy CG, Fuchs GJ. Current state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J]. J Urol, 1989, 141(3 Pt 2): 782-789.

    [19]

    Zeng GH, Zhong W, Chaussy CG, et al. International Alliance of Urolithiasis Guideline on Shockwave Lithotripsy[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2023, 9(3): 513-523. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.013

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  455
  • PDF下载数:  103
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-03-11
刊出日期:  2024-04-06

目录