经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术329例报告

郑涛; 陈伟浩; 张旭; 马鑫; 李宏召; 高江平; 蔡伟; 陈光富; 董隽; 王保军; 史涛坪

经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术329例报告

- 解放军总医院泌尿外科(北京, 100853)
基金项目:
博士后科学基金资助（编号201150M1535），国家自然科学基金杰出青年学者项目资助（编号30725040）

详细信息

通讯作者: 张旭,E-mail:xzhang@foxmail.com

中图分类号: R737.25

收稿日期: 2012-04-28

329 cases of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

- Departments of Urology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHANG Xu, E-mail: xzhang@foxmail.com

Received Date: 28 April 2012

摘要

摘要: 目的：回顾分析329例经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的手术方法和疗效。方法：2005年3月~2010年3月经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术329例，中位年龄67岁，初始前列腺特异性抗原中位数为17.35 μg/L，活检Gleason评分中位数为7。结果：329例手术均成功完成，无中转开放手术。膀胱尿道吻合时间中位数为13 min，手术时间中位数为90 min，术中失血量中位数为75 ml，术后尿管留置时间中位数为6 d。整体切缘阳性率为16.7%，与病理分期和Gleason评分具有相关性（P<0.001）。术后1年内，年轻患者的尿控能力恢复较快，而且性功能恢复较好。术后随访时间中位数为27（14~72）个月，89例出现生化复发；多因素分析显示初始PSA值、切缘阳性率、病理分期和Gleason评分是无生化复发生存的独立预后因素。术前新辅助激素治疗对病理Gleason评分（P<0.001）和手术切缘阳性率（P=0.027）有显著影响，但对生化复发没有显著影响（P=0.202）。结论：经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术是局限性前列腺癌安全有效的微创外科治疗方法，值得临床推广。
- 前列腺癌 /
- 前列腺根治术 /
- 腹膜外途径 /
- 生化复发
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate retrospectively the surgery skill and effects of extraperitioneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.Method: Between March 2005 and March 2010,we performed 329 cases of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.The median age of patients was 67 years and the median initial prostate specific antigen was 17.35 μg/L.The median biopsy Gleason score was 7.Reasult: All the operations were successful without coversion. The median time for the anastomosis, the median operative time and the median postoperative catheterization time were 13 minutes, 90 minutes and 6 days, respectively. The median estimated blood loss was 75 ml. The overall positive surgical margin rate was 16.7% and correlated with pathological stage and Gleason score, respectively(P<0.001). Younger patients had a quicker recovery of continence and a better postoperative potency in one year postoperatively. The median follow-up time was 27(range 14-72)months. 89(28.6%)patients were diagnosed as biochemical recurrence. The initial PSA value, PSM, pathological stage and Gleason score were identified as independent prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence-free survival in multivariate analysis. Preoperative NHT had significant impacts on pathological Gleason score(P< 0.001)and surgical margin(P=0.027), but no significant impact on biochemical recurrence(P=0.202).Conclusion: The extraperitioneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy may be considered as an effective and safe surgical approach for localized prostate cancer, worth to be extended.
- prostate cancer /
- radical prostatectomy /
- extraperitoneal approach /
- biochemical recurrence

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	JEMAL A,BRAY F,CENTER M M,et al.Global cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61:69-90.
[2]	PARKIN D M, BRAY F, FERLAY J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55:74-108.
[3]	赵平,陈万青,雷正龙,等. 前列腺癌[M]. 见:赵平,陈万青.2009中国肿瘤登记年报-中国肿瘤登记地区2006年发病死亡. 北京:军事医学科学出版社,2009:61.
[4]	SCHUESSLER W W,SCHULAM P G,CLAYMAN R V,et al.Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:initial short-term experience[J].Urology,1997,50:854-857.
[5]	RABOY A,FERZLI G,ALBERT P.Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy[J].Urology,1997,50:849-853.
[6]	STOLZENBURG J U,DO M,PFEIFFER H,et al.The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy(EERPE):technique and initial experience[J].World J Urol,2002,20:48-55.
[7]	ROZET F, GALIANO M, CATHELINEAU X, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:a prospective evaluation of 600 cases[J]. J Urol, 2005, 174:908-911.
[8]	STOLZENBURG J U,KALLIDONIS P,MINH D,et al.Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy:evolution of the technique and experience with 2400 cases[J].J Endourol,2009,23:1467-1472.
[9]	EDEN C G,NEILL M G,LOUIE-JOHNSUN M W.The first 1000 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the UK:evidence of multiple ‘learning curves’[J]. BJU Int, 2009, 103:1224-1230.
[10]	DO M,HAEFNER T,LIATSIKOS E,et al.Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of prostate:oncologic and functional outcomes of 100 cases[J].Urology,2010,75:1348-1352.
[11]	ZHANG X,JU Z,WANG C,et al.The single needle method for urethrovesical anastomosis with strengthened posterior fixation during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J].J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci,2009,29:745-749.
[12]	HU J C,ELKIN E P,PASTA D J,et al.Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy:results from CaPSURE[J].J Urol,2004,171(2 Pt 1):703-707.
[13]	MENDIOLA F P,ZORN K C,MIKHAIL A A,et al.Urinary and sexual function outcomes among different age groups after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy[J].J Endourol,2008,22:519-524.