硕通镜和输尿管镜钬激光在输尿管上段感染性结石疗效对比

熊波波; 张劲松; 李宁; 韦海荣; 王海峰; 左毅刚; 王剑松

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2020.07.012

硕通镜和输尿管镜钬激光在输尿管上段感染性结石疗效对比

- 昆明医科大学第二附属医院泌尿外科云南省泌尿外科研究所(昆明, 650101)
基金项目:
云南省科技厅-昆明医科大学联合基础研究面上项目(No:2017FE468-059)

详细信息

通讯作者: 张劲松,E-mail:zhangjinsongkm@163.com

中图分类号: R693

收稿日期: 2019-07-26

Comparison of the efficacy between Shuotongjing and ureteroscopic holmium laser in the upper ureteral infectious calculi

- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Institute of Urology, Kunming, 650101, China

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHANG Jingsong, E-mail: zhangjinsongkm@163.com

Received Date: 26 July 2019

摘要

摘要: 本研究主要探讨了硕通镜钬激光碎石术在输尿管上段感染性结石中的疗效与安全性。分析2018年4月~2019年4月我院诊治的70例输尿管上段感染性结石的诊疗经过,随机分为硕通镜组30例和输尿管镜组40例。分析两组的手术时间、住院时间、术后7 d结石清除率、术后1个月结石清除率、Ⅰ期进镜成功率、Ⅱ期碎石发生率、术后并发症发生率和术后感染指标。硕通镜组患者的手术时间、住院时间显著短于输尿管镜组,Ⅰ期进镜成功率低于输尿管镜组,术后7 d结石清除率(SFR)为93.3%,显著高于输尿管镜组的70%,并发症显著低于输尿管镜组,术后感染指标显著低于输尿管镜组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Ⅱ期碎石发生率低于输尿管镜组,术后1个月SFR为100%,同样高于输尿管镜组的87%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。硕通镜在输尿管上段感染性结石治疗可能一种安全有效的手术方式,具有创伤小、并发症少和术后恢复快等特点。
- 硕通镜 /
- 输尿管镜 /
- 输尿管结石 /
- 感染性结石 /
- 钬激光碎石术
Abstract: This study mainly explored the efficacy and safety of Shuotongjing holmium laser lithotripsy in infectious stones in the upper ureter. Seventy cases of upper ureteral infectious stones diagnosed and treated in our department from April 2018 to April 2019 were randomly divided into the Shuotongjing group(n=30) and the ureteroscope group(n=40). The operation time, hospital stay, stone free rate(SFR) at 7 days postoperatively, SFR at 1 month postoperatively, success rate of stage Ⅰ endoscopic surgery, incidence of stage Ⅱ lithotripsy, incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative infection indicators were compared between two groups. The operation time and hospital stay in the Shuotongjing group were significantly shorter than those in the ureteroscope group. The success rate of stage I entry was lower than that in the ureteroscope group. SFR at 7 days after surgery was 93.3%, which was significantly higher than that in the ureteroscope group. However, the incidence of complication in the Shuotongjing group was significantly lower than that in the ureteroscopy group, and the postoperative infection indicators were significantly lower than those in the ureteroscopy group. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The incidence of stage Ⅱ lithotripsy in the Shuotongjing group was lower than that in the ureteroscopy group. SFR was 100% 1 month after surgery, which was also higher than 87% in the ureteroscopy group. The difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Shuotongjing may be a safe and effective surgical method for the treatment of infectious stones in the upper ureter, with the characteristics of less trauma, less complications and quick postoperative recovery.
- Shuotongjing /
- ureteroscopy /
- ureteral stones /
- infectious stones /
- holmium laser lithotripsy

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	Song Y,Hernandez N,Gee MS,et al.Can ureteral stones cause pain without causing hydronephrosis?[J].World J Urol,2016,34(9):1285-1288.
[2]	Ochi F,Furuno K,Chong PF,et al.Bilateral hydronephrosis due to obstructive ureteral stone associated with norovirus gastroenteritis[J].Clin Case Rep,2017,5(6):936-938.
[3]	熊波波,张劲松,王海峰,等.硕通镜联合钬激光治疗肾盂结石的临床疗效[J].昆明医科大学学报,2019,40(4):66-70.
[4]	Abedi AR,Razzaghi MR,Allameh F,et al.Pneumatic Lithotripsy Versus Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones[J].J Lasers Med Sci,2018,9(4):233-236.
[5]	胡明,石明,徐勋,等.输尿管结石进展为尿脓毒血症预测模型的优化与可视化呈现[J].实用医学杂志,2018,34(24):4137-4140.
[6]	邓小林,宋乐明,钟久庆,等.智能监控腔内压力的输尿管硬镜吸引取石术治疗复杂输尿管结石[J].中国现代医学杂志,2018,28(4):120-123.
[7]	徐郁颖,陈云峰,江涌.上段输尿管结石合并感染的危险因素和病原学分析[J].重庆医学,2019,48(7):1210-1212.
[8]	Hope CK,Higham SM,Evaluating the effect of local pH on fluorescence emissions from oral bacteria of the genus Prevotella[J].J Biomed Opt,2016,21(8):84003.
[9]	罗湘蓉,郑朋玉,袁军,等.泌尿道结石患者尿道感染病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J].中国医科大学学报,2015,44(11):1031-1034.
[10]	刘杰,白大应,石磊,等.输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜治疗2-3 cm肾结石的对照研究[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2018,12(6):375-379.
[11]	顾燕,姜宁,李健,等.体外冲击波碎石和输尿管镜钬激光碎石治疗输尿管上段结石疗效对比[J].实用医学杂志,2018,34(24):4123-4126.
[12]	龙兆麟,黄韬,廖春贤.标准通道与微创经皮肾镜取石术在不同肾盂压力下治疗鹿角形肾结石比较[J].实用医学杂志,2018,34(13):2217-2220.
[13]	李长龄.输尿管镜治疗输尿管上段结石合并感染疗效观察[J].河南外科学杂志,2017,23(1):97-98.
[14]	潘东升,赵兴华,许长宝,等.硕通镜在治疗上尿路结石梗阻性脓肾中的应用[J].临床与病理杂志,2018,26(12):2616-2620.
[15]	王树声,翁湘涛,周均洪,等.硕通镜治疗上尿路结石的有效性与安全性[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2017,38(9):671-674.
[16]	种丽强.输尿管镜钬激光治疗输尿管上段结石防止结石逃逸方法的研究进展[J].临床与病理杂志,2017,25(11):2489-2493.
[17]	刘陈黎,周艳,廖锦先,等.MPCNL与URL治疗输尿管上段结石梗阻合并感染的对比研究[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2019,34(3):186-188.
[18]	Jiang JT,Li WG,Zhu YP,et al.Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of obstructive upper ureteral calculi with concurrent urinary tract infections[J].Lasers Med Sci,2016,31(5):915-920.