多西他赛新辅助化疗在局部进展期及寡转移前列腺癌治疗中的疗效分析

祁峰, 娄可心, 李潇, 等. 多西他赛新辅助化疗在局部进展期及寡转移前列腺癌治疗中的疗效分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 37(6): 447-451. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2022.06.009
引用本文: 祁峰, 娄可心, 李潇, 等. 多西他赛新辅助化疗在局部进展期及寡转移前列腺癌治疗中的疗效分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 37(6): 447-451. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2022.06.009
QI Feng, LOU Kexin, LI Xiao, et al. Efficacy of docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced and oligometastatic prostate cancer[J]. J Clin Urol, 2022, 37(6): 447-451. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2022.06.009
Citation: QI Feng, LOU Kexin, LI Xiao, et al. Efficacy of docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced and oligometastatic prostate cancer[J]. J Clin Urol, 2022, 37(6): 447-451. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2022.06.009

多西他赛新辅助化疗在局部进展期及寡转移前列腺癌治疗中的疗效分析

详细信息

Efficacy of docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced and oligometastatic prostate cancer

More Information
  • 目的 探讨基于多西他赛化疗联合全雄激素阻断的新辅助疗法用于治疗局部进展期及寡转移前列腺癌的有效性及安全性。方法 研究共纳入了在南京医科大学附属肿瘤医院接受新辅助化疗联合全雄激素阻断治疗的54例前列腺癌患者,包括28例局部进展期和26例寡转移前列腺癌患者。收集入组患者的基本信息、化疗情况及术后病理资料;比较局部进展期和寡转移患者之间病理的降级率、病理学完全缓解(pCR)率、切缘阳性率及PSA 90缓解率;此外,对比不同化疗周期对患者术后病理的影响;并收集患者新辅助治疗期间的不良毒副反应以探索该治疗模式的安全性。结果 新辅助治疗后,总体患者的PSA 90缓解率达85.19%;40.74%的患者出现术后ISUP级组降级,并有12.96%的患者达pCR。局部进展期和寡转移患者新辅助治疗后在PSA 90缓解率、ISUP级组变化、pCR率及术后切缘阳性率方面无显著差异。此外,在总人群中,化疗周期对PSA 90缓解率、ISUP级组变化、pCR率、化疗反应度及术后切缘阳性率无显著影响。46例(85.19%)患者在新辅助治疗过程中出现不良反应,均在对症支持治疗后好转。结论 基于多西他赛化疗联合全雄激素阻断的新辅助疗法在局部晚期和寡转移前列腺癌患者中初步展现出较为不错的应用前景,但未来仍需大样本、前瞻性的随机对照研究来验证本研究的结果。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  两组患者的基本资料 例(%),X±S

    变量 总例数(n=54) 局部进展期组(n=28) 寡转移组(n=26) t2 P
    年龄/岁 66.67±6.81 68.64±5.61 64.54±7.44 2.300 0.026
    初诊PSA/(ng·mL-1) 188.75±307.40 89.78±190.15 295.34±372.15 -2.583 0.013
    穿刺ISUP分组 5.800 0.196
      1级 2(3.70) 2(7.14) 0
      2级 5(9.26) 4(14.29) 1(3.85)
      3级 6(11.11) 1(3.57) 5(19.23)
      4级 17(31.48) 9(32.14) 8(30.77)
      5级 24(44.44) 12(42.86) 12(46.15)
    化疗周期 3.564 0.059
      <4 30(55.56) 19(67.86) 11(42.31)
      ≥4 24(44.44) 9(32.14) 15(57.69)
    注:前列腺特异性抗原(PSA);国际泌尿病理协会(ISUP)。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  入组患者的化疗反应及术后病理情况 例(%),X±S

    变量 总例数(n=54) 局部进展期组(n=28) 寡转移组(n=26) t2 P
    术前PSA/(ng·mL-1) 3.41±7.43 2.67±5.42 4.21±9.16 -0.755 0.454
    术后ISUP分组 3.632 0.780
      0级 7(12.96) 2(7.14) 5(19.23)
      1级 4(7.41) 3(10.71) 1(3.85)
      2级 4(7.41) 2(7.14) 2(7.69)
      3级 8(14.81) 4(14.29) 4(15.38)
      4级 4(7.41) 3(10.71) 1(3.85)
      5级 24(44.44) 12(42.86) 12(46.15)
    少量癌成分 3(5.56) 2(7.14) 1(3.85)
    pCR 1.746 0.243
      是 7(12.96) 2(7.14) 5(19.23)
      否 47(87.04) 26(92.86) 21(80.77)
    切缘阳性 1.230 0.267
      是 13(24.07) 5(17.86) 8(30.77)
      否 41(75.93) 23(82.14) 18(69.23)
    ISUP级组变化 2.019 0.435
      升级 8(14.81) 6(21.43) 2(7.69)
      降级 22(40.74) 11(39.29) 11(42.31)
      无变化 24(44.44) 11(39.29) 13(50.00)
    PSA下降率 2.016 0.253
      ≥90% 46(85.19) 22(78.57) 24(92.31)
      <90% 8(14.81) 6(21.43) 2(7.69)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  不同化疗周期对化疗反应和术后病理的影响 

    变量 <4周期(n=30) ≥4周期(n=24) χ2 P
    升降级情况 1.458 0.573
      升级 6 2
      降级 11 11
      无变化 13 11
    PSA下降率 3.881 0.063
      ≥90% 23 23
      <90% 7 1
    切缘阳性 2.026 0.155
      是 5 8
      否 25 16
    化疗反应 3.079 0.403
      0 4 6
      1 4 1
      2 12 12
      3 10 5
    pCR 1.203 0.311
      是 4 6
      否 26 18
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  新辅助化疗联合全雄阻断治疗的不良反应

    不良反应 例数 百分比/%
    血液系统
      粒细胞减少(Ⅰ~Ⅱ) 30 55.56
      粒细胞减少(Ⅲ~Ⅳ) 9 16.67
      贫血 5 9.26
      血小板减少 3 5.56
    消化系统
      肝功能异常 7 12.96
      恶心呕吐 13 24.07
      大便习惯改变 9 16.67
    过敏反应
      严重过敏反应 0 0
      皮疹 5 9.26
    内分泌生殖系统
      潮热、面部潮红 30 55.56
      乳房发育 6 11.11
      性欲减退 35 64.81
    其他 7 12.96
    注:其他包括下肢水肿、口腔溃疡、外周神经痛等。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492

    [2]

    Hussain M, Tangen CM, Thompson IM Jr, et al. Phase Ⅲ Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation With or Without Mitoxantrone Plus Prednisone in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: SWOG S9921[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(15): 1498-1504. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4126

    [3]

    Stewart SB, Cheville JC, Sebo TJ, et al. Gleason grading after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy retains prognostic value for systemic progression following radical prostatectomy[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2014, 17(4): 332-337. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2014.30

    [4]

    Kumar S, Shelley M, Harrison C, et al. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006, (4): CD006019.

    [5]

    潘家骅, 迟辰斐, 董柏君, 等. 多西他赛联合全雄阻断新辅助疗法治疗高危局部进展性前列腺癌的安全性[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2017, 37(6): 797-802. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHEY201706020.htm

    [6]

    Bastian PJ, Gonzalgo ML, Aronson WJ, et al. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10[J]. Cancer, 2006, 107(6): 1265-1272. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22116

    [7]

    Thompson IM, Tangen C, Basler J, et al. Impact of previous local treatment for prostate cancer on subsequent metastatic disease[J]. J Urol, 2002, 168(3): 1008-1012. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64562-4

    [8]

    Yossepowitch O, Eggener SE, Bianco FJ Jr, et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods[J]. J Urol, 2007, 178(2): 493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.105

    [9]

    Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The ORIOLE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2020, 6(5): 650-659. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0147

    [10]

    Ost P, Reynders D, Decaestecker K, et al. Surveillance or Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Recurrence: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Phase ⅡTrial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(5): 446-453. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4853

    [11]

    Heidenreich A, Pfister D. Radical cytoreductive prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer and oligometastatic disease[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2020, 30(1): 90-97. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000691

    [12]

    Chen H, Qu M, Lian BJ, et al. Short-term therapeutic outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for oligometastatic prostate cancer: a propensity score matching study[J]. Chin Med J(Engl), 2020, 133(2): 127-133.

    [13]

    Chi C, Fan L, Dong B, et al. Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy in Oligometastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Three-Arm, Comparative Propensity Score Match Analysis[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 2021, 19(4): e223-e234. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.02.004

    [14]

    Ost P, Bossi A, Decaestecker K, et al. Metastasis-directed therapy of regional and distant recurrences after curative treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 67(5): 852-863. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.004

    [15]

    Pietzak EJ, Eastham JA. Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-Risk, Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Prior to Radical Prostatectomy[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2016, 17(5): 37. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0592-4

    [16]

    侯惠民, 刘明, 王建业. 寡转移前列腺癌新辅助化疗一例报告[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 41(1): 21-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMW202206009.htm

    [17]

    Wood DP Jr, Beaman A, Banerjee M, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation on circulating prostate cells in the bone marrow of men undergoing radical prostatectomy[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 1998, 4(9): 2119-2123.

    [18]

    Rosenthal SA, Hu C, Sartor O, et al. Effect of Chemotherapy With Docetaxel With Androgen Suppression and Radiotherapy for Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer: The Randomized Phase Ⅲ NRG Oncology RTOG 0521 Trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(14): 1159-1168. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02158

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1040
  • PDF下载数:  771
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-09-21
录用日期:  2022-02-07
刊出日期:  2022-06-06

目录