Solyx<sup>TM</sup>单切口吊带系统治疗女性压力性尿失禁的临床研究

廖科学; 陆伟; 栗恒; 夏钢; 殷波

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2022.10.013

Solyx^TM单切口吊带系统治疗女性压力性尿失禁的临床研究

- 信阳市中心医院泌尿外科(河南信阳，464000)

详细信息

通讯作者: 陆伟，E-mail：luwei566@163.com

中图分类号: R694

收稿日期: 2021-10-20

刊出日期: 2022-10-06

Clinical study of Solyx^TM system: modified sling system for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence

- Department of Urolory, Xinyang Central Hospital, Xinyang, Henan, 464000, China

More Information

Corresponding author: LU Wei, E-mail: luwei566@163.com

Received Date: 20 October 2021

Publish Date: 06 October 2022

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨Solyx^TM单切口吊带系统治疗女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的临床疗效及安全性。方法对2020年8月—2021年8月在信阳市中心医院泌尿外科住院并确诊为SUI女性患者应用Solyx^TM单切口吊带系统进行尿道中段无张力悬吊，了解并评价其治愈率和术后并发症等。结果 26例患者，年龄44~85岁，病程1~27年，分娩1~6次，体重指数(BMI)19.6~26.4 kg/m²，腹腔漏尿点压(ALPP)56~106 cmH₂O，最大尿流率(Q_max)22~43 mL/s。26例患者手术均获得成功，手术时间12~28 min，失血量5~20 mL，术后住院日2~5 d。无膀胱、尿道、肠管和阴道损伤，无会阴血肿和切口感染。拔尿管后尿失禁均消失，咳嗽试验阴性。2例排尿费力，经尿道扩张重新导尿48 h后症状消失。1例尿潴留小便无法排出，经再次手术处理后排尿通畅无尿潴留，尿失禁症状消失；无新发尿急；尿频1例口服托特罗定1周后治愈。随访2~12个月尿失禁均无复发。结论 Solyx^TM单切口吊带系统治疗女性SUI创伤小，恢复快，近期疗效良好，腹股沟疼痛、血肿等并发症明显少于经闭孔无张力阴道悬吊术(TVT-O)，有较好的应用前景。
- 压力性尿失禁 /
- 无张力悬吊 /
- 单切口 /
- 闭孔 /
- 疗效 /
- 并发症
Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Solyx^TM surgery in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).Methods From August 2020 to August 2021, female patients hospitalized in the Department of Urology of Xinyang Central Hospital were treated with Solyx^TM operation, and the cure rate and postoperative complications were evaluated.Results Twenty-six patients, aged 44-85 years old, with a course of 1-27 years, delivered 1-5 times, height and body mass index (BMI) 19.6-26.4 kg/m², abdominal leakage point pressure (ALPP) 56-106 cmH₂O, and maximum urinary flow rate (Q_max) 22-43 mL/s were included. All 26 procedures were successful. The amount of bleeding was 5-20 mL, and the postoperative hospital stay was 2-5 days. No bladder, urethra, intestine or vagina injury, perineal hematoma or incision infection was found.After extubation, urinary incontinence disappeared and cough test was negative. One case of urinary retention cannot discharge, but urinary incontinence symptoms disappeared and urine retention was seldom found after repeated operation. No new onset of urgency occurrred. One patient with frequent urination was cured after taking tolterodine orally for 1 week. There was no recurrence of urinary incontinence during 2-12 months of follow-up period.Conclusion Solyx^TM surgical treatment for women with SUI has a good application prospect for its little trauma, rapid recovery, good short-term efficacy, and less inguinal pain, hematoma and other complications compared with TVT-O.
- stress urinary incontinence /
- no tension suspension /
- single incision /
- obturator foramen /
- efficacy /
- complications

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	段继宏, 杨勇, 吴士良, 等. 北京地区尿失禁发病率调查[J]. 北京医科大学学报, 2000, 32(1): 74-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BYDB200001023.htm
[2]	李志毅, 朱兰. 女性压力性尿失禁流行病学现状[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2018, 34(3): 161-162. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFCZ201803002.htm
[3]	刘献辉, 张维宇, 胡浩, 等. 耻骨后和经闭孔尿道中段悬吊术对不同分型压力性尿失禁疗效的长期随访[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 694-697. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BYDB201904018.htm
[4]	Zhang Y, Song X, Mao M, et al. Tension-Free Vaginal Tape for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 13-Year Prospective Follow-Up[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2019, 26(4): 754-759. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.08.010
[5]	潘铁军, 李佳怡. 女性压力性尿失禁的诊疗进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 34(6): 417-421. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHQJ202106021.htm
[6]	许盛飞, 秦保龙, 等. 经尿道联合经阴道Smooth模式铒激光照射治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效评价[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 36(6): 481-484. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMW202106013.htm
[7]	Serati M, Braga A, Athanasiou S, et al. Tension-free Vaginal Tape-Obturator for Treatment of Pure Urodynamic Stress Urinary Incontinence: Efficacy and Adverse Effects at 10-year Follow-up[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 71(4): 674-679.
[8]	江长琴, 梁朝朝, 张翼飞, 等. 经闭孔无张力尿道中段悬吊术治疗女性压力性尿失禁手术技巧及临床疗效分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 32(7): 551-553. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMW201707015.htm
[9]	Neuman M. TVT and TVT-Obturator: comparison of two operative procedures[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2007, 131(1): 89-92.
[10]	Daneshgari F, Kong W, Swartz M. Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials[J]. J Urol, 2008, 180(5): 1890-1897.
[11]	Bianchi-Ferraro AMHM, Bella JD, Castro RDA, et al. Single-incision sling compared with transobturator sling for treating stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2013, 24(9): 1459-1465.
[12]	丛志承, 求旦旦. 闭孔尿道中段无张力悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效及术后短暂性尿潴留的危险因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(7): 1651-1654. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201807071.htm
[13]	Ulrich D, Tamman A, HÖlbfer S, et al. Ten-year Followup after Tension-Free Vaginal Tape-Obturator Procedure for Stree Urinary Incontinence[J]. J Urol, 2016, 196(4): 1201-1206.
[14]	Blaivas JG, Purohit RS, Weinberger JM, et al. Salvage Surgery after Failed Treatment of Synthetic Mesh Sling Complications[J]. J Urol, 2013, 190(4): 1281-1286.
[15]	Spinosa JP, Dubuis PY, Riederer BM. Transobturator surgery for female stress incontinence: a comparative anatomical study of outside-in vs inside-out techniques[J]. BJU Int, 2007, 100(5): 1097-1102.