游离包皮内板尿道板头段镶嵌-尿道板纵切卷管尿道成形术在尿道下裂中的应用

王寿福, 陈海琛, 胡杨, 等. 游离包皮内板尿道板头段镶嵌-尿道板纵切卷管尿道成形术在尿道下裂中的应用[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 38(3): 184-187. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.03.006
引用本文: 王寿福, 陈海琛, 胡杨, 等. 游离包皮内板尿道板头段镶嵌-尿道板纵切卷管尿道成形术在尿道下裂中的应用[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 38(3): 184-187. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.03.006
WANG Shoufu, CHEN Haichen, HU Yang, et al. Glans grafted tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in hypospadias repair[J]. J Clin Urol, 2023, 38(3): 184-187. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.03.006
Citation: WANG Shoufu, CHEN Haichen, HU Yang, et al. Glans grafted tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in hypospadias repair[J]. J Clin Urol, 2023, 38(3): 184-187. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.03.006

游离包皮内板尿道板头段镶嵌-尿道板纵切卷管尿道成形术在尿道下裂中的应用

详细信息

Glans grafted tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in hypospadias repair

More Information
  • 目的 探讨游离包皮内板尿道板头段镶嵌-尿道板纵切卷管尿道成形术(glans grafted tubularised incised plate,GG-TIP)治疗尿道下裂的临床可行性及应用效果。方法 收集分析2019年1月—2021年10月我院166例应用尿道板纵切卷管尿道成形术(TIP)手术修复尿道下裂的患儿资料。分为A、B 2组,其中A组为GG-TIP手术组,即在TIP手术中阴茎头段背侧加深纵切联合头段局部游离包皮内板镶嵌,B组为经典TIP手术组。记录A、B组临床随访资料、术后并发症情况、最大尿流率(Qmax)及尿道下裂客观评分标准(HOSE),对结果进行统计学分析。结果 共166例纳入分析,患儿平均年龄(21.20±9.64)个月,随访时间6~34个月。阴茎头型14例,阴茎体型127例,阴茎阴囊型25例,阴囊型及会阴型0例。A组的手术时间长于B组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。A、B组术后总并发症情况差异无统计学意义(10.34% vs 15.74%,P=0.337);尿道瘘(χ2=0.114,P=0.735)、尿道狭窄(χ2=0.365,P=0.546)及阴茎头裂开(χ2=0.506,P=0.477)的发生情况差异无统计学意义。A组术后2周的Qmax优于B组[(9.46±1.57) mL/s vs(8.12±1.18) mL/s],差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。A组HOSE评分(15.09±0.98)分,且尿道口均位于阴茎头前端,呈垂直裂隙状,B组HOSE评分(14.67±0.85)分,A组HOSE评分高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 GG-TIP手术修复儿童尿道下裂是安全、有效的,该术式操作简单,可改善术后尿流率,且阴茎外观美观,值得推广。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  GG-TIP手术关键步骤

    表 1  2组患儿术后并发症情况比较 例(%)

    组别 例数 尿道瘘 尿道狭窄 阴茎头裂开 并发症总数
    A组 58 3(5.17) 2(3.45) 1(1.72) 6(10.34)
    B组 108 7(6.48) 6(5.56) 4(3.70) 17(15.74)
    χ2 - 0.114 0.365 0.506 0.921
    P - 0.735 0.546 0.477 0.337
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  2组患儿术后Qmax及HOSE评分比较 X±S

    组别 例数 Qmax/(mL·s-1) HOSE评分/分
    A组 58 9.46±1.57 15.09±0.98
    B组 108 8.12±1.18 14.67±0.85
    t - 6.184 2.866
    P - < 0.001 0.005
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    陈绍基, 王学军, 唐耘熳. 尿道下裂手术策略十二字方针[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2022, 21(1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXR202201001.htm

    [2]

    Snodgrass W. Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias[J]. J Urol, 1994, 151(2): 464-465. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34991-1

    [3]

    Holland AJ, Smith GH, Ross FI, et al. HOSE: an objective scoring system for evaluating the results of hypospadias surgery[J]. BJU Int, 2001, 88(3): 255-258. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02280.x

    [4]

    Tekgul S, Dogan HS, Kocvara R. Guidelines on pediatric urology in EAU guidelines[C]//Edn. presented at the 32nd EAU Annual Congress, London. 2017.

    [5]

    Lucas J, Hightower T, Weiss DA, et al. Time to Complication Detection after Primary Pediatric Hypospadias Repair: A Large, Single Center, Retrospective Cohort Analysis[J]. J Urol, 2020, 204(2): 338-344. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000762

    [6]

    Loloi J, Harrington S, Boltz S, et al. Ingrafts in hypospadias surgery: Longer-term outcomes[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2020, 16(5): 555. e1-555. e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.04.030

    [7]

    Silay MS, 't Hoen L, Bhatt N, et al. Are there any benefits of using an inlay graft in the treatment of primary hypospadias in children? A systematic review and metanalysis[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2021, 17(3): 303-315. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.02.013

    [8]

    Alshafei A, Cascio S, Boland F, et al. Comparing the outcomes of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty and dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty in children with hypospadias: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2020, 16(2): 154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.01.009

    [9]

    Perera M, Jones B, O'Brien M, et al. Long-term urethral function measured by uroflowmetry after hypospadias surgery: comparison with an age matched control[J]. J Urol, 2012, 188(4 Suppl): 1457-1462.

    [10]

    Bush NC, Villanueva C, Snodgrass W. Glans size is an independent risk factor for urethroplasty complications after hypospadias repair[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2015, 11(6): 355. e1-355. e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.05.029

    [11]

    唐耘熳. 尿道下裂术后尿道狭窄、阴茎头裂开及尿道憩室的认识及处理[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2017, 16(3): 212-214.

    [12]

    刘愉, 覃道锐, 王学军. 初治尿道下裂TIP手术后并发症的相关因素分析: 309例单中心研究[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2020, 19(12): 1094-1099. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXR202012009.htm

    [13]

    李忠远, 郭永连, 李国灏等. TFP与TIP在青少年远段型尿道下裂首次修复中的疗效对比[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 35(12): 967-970. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMW202012007.htm

    [14]

    刘伟, 武翔宇, 王晓庆, 等. 尿道板纵切卷管尿道成形术后阴茎头裂开的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2019, 40(11): 963-966.

    [15]

    Bush NC, Snodgrass W. Pre-incision urethral plate width does not impact short-term tubularized incised plate urethroplasty outcomes[J]. Journal of pediatric urology, 2017, 13(6): 625. e1-625. e6.

    [16]

    Ahmed M, Alsaid A. Is combined inner preputial inlay graft with tubularized incised plate in hypospadias repair worth doing?[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2015, 11(4): 229. e1-4.

    [17]

    Gupta V, Yadav SK, Alanzi T, et al. Grafted tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty: An objective assessment of outcome with lessons learnt from surgical experience with 263 cases[J]. Arab J Urol, 2016, 14(4): 299-304.

  • 加载中

(1)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  758
  • PDF下载数:  192
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-10-25
刊出日期:  2023-03-06

目录