经会阴前列腺穿刺患者术中疼痛的影响因素

吴振豪, 丁雪飞, 栾阳, 等. 经会阴前列腺穿刺患者术中疼痛的影响因素[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 38(9): 681-684. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.09.008
引用本文: 吴振豪, 丁雪飞, 栾阳, 等. 经会阴前列腺穿刺患者术中疼痛的影响因素[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 38(9): 681-684. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.09.008
WU Zhenhao, DING Xuefei, LUAN Yang, et al. Research on the influencing factors of intraoperative pain in patients with biopsy[J]. J Clin Urol, 2023, 38(9): 681-684. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.09.008
Citation: WU Zhenhao, DING Xuefei, LUAN Yang, et al. Research on the influencing factors of intraoperative pain in patients with biopsy[J]. J Clin Urol, 2023, 38(9): 681-684. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.09.008

经会阴前列腺穿刺患者术中疼痛的影响因素

  • 基金项目:
    江苏省卫健委科研课题重点项目(No:ZD2022010)
详细信息

Research on the influencing factors of intraoperative pain in patients with biopsy

More Information
  • 目的 探讨前列腺穿刺患者术中疼痛的影响因素。方法 回顾性分析2019年3月—2021年11月苏北人民医院收治的628例前列腺穿刺活检患者的临床资料[年龄、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、穿刺针数、前列腺体积、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、糖尿病史、体重指数、美国东部协作肿瘤组(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group,ECOG)评分、重大外伤史、手术史、血型],根据患者穿刺术中的VAS评分(2~7)将患者分为A~F共6组,比较组间数据的差异。结果 入组患者的年龄(P=0.002)、PSA(P < 0.001)、前列腺体积(P < 0.001)、穿刺针数(P < 0.001)、体重指数(P < 0.001)、生活质量评分(P < 0.001)分布均不符合正态分布,组间的年龄(P=0.152)、PSA(P=0.824)、体重指数(P=0.282)、生活质量评分(P=0.244)、手术史(P=0.799)、血型(P=0.376)比较差异无统计学意义,前列腺体积(P < 0.001)、穿刺针数(P < 0.001)、糖尿病史(P < 0.001)、重大外伤史(P=0.023)比较差异有统计学意义。多元线性回归分析提示前列腺体积(t=11.389,P < 0.001)、糖尿病史(t=-3.222,P=0.001)是术中疼痛的主要影响因素,前列腺体积较大、穿刺针数较多的患者VAS评分较高,糖尿病患者、有重大外伤史的患者VAS评分较低。结论 行前列腺穿刺活检时,前列腺体积、穿刺针数与术中疼痛正性相关,糖尿病患病情况、重大外伤经历与术中疼痛负性相关。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  各分组组间数据差异性分析 例,M(P25P75)

    项目 A组(292例) B组(90例) C组(64例) D组(110例) E组(50例) F组(22例) P
    年龄/岁 70(63,75) 72(67,77) 69(63,74.5) 71(66,77) 72(68,77) 73(70.5,75) 0.152
    PSA/(ng/mL) 13.9 (9.6,25.9) 14.6 (10.1,26.4) 17.3 (10.9,26.5) 14 (11.3,20.0) 12.6 (11.1,22.3) 14.6 (10.3,23.8) 0.824
    穿刺针数 20 (18,23) 19 (18,21) 20 (19.5,21) 23 (21,23) 24 (23,24) 25 (24,25) < 0.001
    前列腺体积/mL 35.3 (26.3,52.1) 39.1 (33.5,45.1) 46.9 (38.5,56.5) 68.9 (60.4,75.7) 87.4 (80.8,96.7) 107.5 (93.8,128.8) < 0.001
    体重指数/(kg/m2) 24.2 (23.1,26.7) 24.2 (23.1,25.0) 23.7 (22.5,24.6) 23.9 (23.0,24.8) 24.2 (22.7,25.7) 23.9 (22.8,24.6) 0.282
    ECOG评分 0(0,0) 0(0,1) 0(0,0) 0(0,1) 0(0,0) 0(0,0.5) 0.244
    糖尿病史 114 38 8 14 4 2 < 0.001
    手术史 84 32 20 28 10 6 0.799
    重大外伤史 76 14 8 8 4 4 0.023
    血型 0.376
        A 104 34 16 28 20 14
        B 84 20 24 32 10 0
        AB 36 8 4 14 4 6
        O 68 28 20 36 16 2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  影响因素的多元线性回归分析

    自变量 回归系数 标准误差 标准回归系数 t P
    常数项 0.634 0.558 - 1.138 0.256
    前列腺体积 0.056 0.003 0.574 11.389 < 0.001
    穿刺针数 0.033 0.029 0.094 1.908 0.057
    糖尿病史 -0.468 0.145 -0.136 -3.222 0.001
    重大外伤史 -0.316 0.168 -0.079 -1.885 0.060
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, et al. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates[J]. Eur Urol, 2020, 77(1): 38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005

    [2]

    冯天瑞. 经会阴前列腺穿刺活检研究进展[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 36(6): 485-491. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2021.06.013 http://lcmw.cbpt.cnki.net/WKC/WebPublication/paperDigest.aspx?paperID=3220fb58-fa95-44e4-aea6-00f14699a3f7

    [3]

    Sivaraman A, Ramasamy V, Aarthy P, et al. Safety and feasibility of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia: Our initial experience[J]. Indian J Urol, 2022, 38(1): 34-41. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_222_21

    [4]

    Beyer K, Moris L, Lardas M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic factors in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(2): e040531. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040531

    [5]

    Derin O, Fonseca L, Sanchez-Salas R, et al. Infectious complications of prostate biopsy: winning battles but not war[J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(11): 2743-2753. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03112-3

    [6]

    Pilatz A, Veeratterapillay R, Dimitropoulos K, et al. European Association of Urology Position Paper on the Prevention of Infectious Complications Following Prostate Biopsy[J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 79(1): 11-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.10.019

    [7]

    Hsieh PF, Chang TY, Lin WC, et al. A comparative study of transperineal software-assisted magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion biopsy and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate[J]. BMC Urol, 2022, 22(1): 72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01011-w

    [8]

    Udeh EI, Amu OC, Nnabugwu Ⅱ, et al. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: our findings in a tertiary health institution[J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2015, 18(1): 110-114. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.146991

    [9]

    Thurtle D, Starling L, Leonard K, et al. Improving the safety and tolerability of local anaesthetic outpatient transperineal prostate biopsies: A pilot study of the CAMbridge PROstate Biopsy(CAMPROBE)method[J]. J Clin Urol, 2018, 11(3): 192-199. doi: 10.1177/2051415818762683

    [10]

    Henry GH, Malewska A, Joseph DB, et al. A Cellular Anatomy of the Normal Adult Human Prostate and Prostatic Urethra[J]. Cell Rep, 2018, 25(12): 3530-3542. e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.086

    [11]

    Hogan D, Kanagarajah A, Yao HH, et al. Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications[J]. BJUI Compass, 2021, 2(6): 428-435. doi: 10.1002/bco2.106

    [12]

    Iremashvili VV, Chepurov AK, Kobaladze KM, et al. Periprostatic local anesthesia with pudendal block for transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a randomized trial[J]. Urology, 2010, 75(5): 1023-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.083

    [13]

    Ding XF, Luan Y, Wang F, et al. The application of a targeted periprostatic nerve block in transperineal template-guided prostate biopsies[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2020, 10(11): 2125-2132. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-369

    [14]

    陶陶, 夏开国, 沈德贇, 等. 前列腺体积和炎性细胞浸润对前列腺穿刺活检阳性率的影响[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2020, 26(5): 409-413. doi: 10.13263/j.cnki.nja.2020.05.004

    [15]

    He BM, Li RB, Wang HF. Anaesthesia in PROstate Biopsy Pain Obstruction Study: A Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Perineal Nerve Block in Controlling Pain in Patients Undergoing Transperineal Prostate Biopsy[J]. Front Surg, 2021, 8: 649822. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.649822

    [16]

    Kaver I, Mabjeesh NJ, Matzkin H. Randomized prospective study of periprostatic local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy[J]. Urology, 2002, 59(3): 405-408. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01538-2

    [17]

    Haastert-Talini K, Dahlin LB. Diabetes, its impact on peripheral nerve regeneration: lessons from pre-clinical rat models towards nerve repair and reconstruction[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2018, 13(1): 65-66. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.224370

    [18]

    Stanley SA. Diabetes: Peripheral nerve modulation to treat metabolic disease[J]. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2018, 14(4): 193-194. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2018.21

    [19]

    Fyfe I. Peripheral neuropathies: Nerve damage differs between diabetes types[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2018, 14(4): 194.

    [20]

    Dar R, Ariely D, Frenk H. The effect of past-injury on pain threshold and tolerance[J]. Pain, 1995, 60(2): 189-193. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00108-Q

    [21]

    Leone C, Truini A. The CPM Effect: Functional Assessment of the Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control in Humans[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2019, 36(6): 430-436. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000599

    [22]

    Simoni AH, Jerwiarz A, Randers A, et al. Association between ABO blood types and pain perception[J]. Somatosens Mot Res, 2017, 34(4): 258-264. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2018.1425675

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  777
  • PDF下载数:  157
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-05-16
刊出日期:  2023-09-06

目录